McCord J M
Webb-Waring Institute, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver 80262, USA.
Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1995 Jun;209(2):112-7. doi: 10.3181/00379727-209-43885c.
The study of free radical biology has engendered a great deal of controversy and apparently conflicting observations, particularly with regard to the use of the antioxidant enzyme superoxide dismutase as a protective or therapeutic agent. Slowly, the reasons behind the confusion are beginning to emerge. The superoxide radical, O2.-, has a number of paradoxical physiological and pathophysiological roles. Several examples of the radical's schizophrenic behavior include its roles in bactericidal action versus inflammation, as a modulator of cell division versus malignant transformation and apoptosis, and as both an initiator and a terminator of lipid peroxidation.
自由基生物学的研究引发了大量争议以及明显相互矛盾的观察结果,尤其是在将抗氧化酶超氧化物歧化酶用作保护剂或治疗剂方面。慢慢地,造成这种困惑的原因开始显现出来。超氧阴离子自由基O2.-具有许多自相矛盾的生理和病理生理作用。这种自由基的矛盾行为的几个例子包括其在杀菌作用与炎症中的作用、作为细胞分裂调节剂与恶性转化和细胞凋亡的关系,以及作为脂质过氧化的引发剂和终止剂的双重身份。