Zeng F G, Shannon R V
House Ear Institute, Los Angeles, CA 90057, USA.
Hear Res. 1995 Feb;82(2):216-24. doi: 10.1016/0378-5955(94)00179-t.
A non-monotonic intensity discrimination function in forward masking has been recently reported [Zeng et al. (1991) Hear. Res. 55, 223-230; Zeng and Turner (1992) J. Acoust Soc. Am. 92, 782-787] in which just-noticeable-differences (jnds) in intensity are largest for midlevel tones and smaller for soft and loud tones following an intense narrow-band noise. One hypothesis was that this midlevel hump reflects the contribution of low-spontaneous rate (SR) neurons to intensity coding, based on the differential recovery from forward masking of low-SR and high-SR neurons [Relkin and Doucet (1991) Hear. Res. 55, 215-222]. The present study conducted three experiments stimulating different stages of the auditory system in an attempt to determine the peripheral and central origins of the midlevel hump. First, in two cochlear implant (CI) listeners, the forward masker produced a midlevel hump on the intensity discrimination function, suggesting that the synapses between the hair cell and the eighth nerve are probably not responsible for the hump, as they are bypassed and the eighth nerve is stimulated directly. Second, in auditory brainstem implant (ABI) listeners, the forward masker produced no midlevel hump, but the masked jnds were larger than those without a masker. The absence of the midlevel hump in the ABI listeners suggests that the occurrence of the hump requires physiological mechanisms in the auditory nerve transmission, or the intrinsic processing circuits of the cochlear nuclei, or both. Third, in normal-hearing listeners, an ipsilateral, 90 dB SPL, pure-tone forward masker produced a midlevel hump, which is similar to that using a narrow-band noise masker; whereas a contralateral forward masker produced essentially no midlevel hump, suggesting that binaural interactions at superior olivary complex and more central sites are probably not responsible.
最近有报道称,前掩蔽中存在一种非单调强度辨别函数[曾等人(1991年),《听觉研究》55卷,223 - 230页;曾和特纳(1992年),《美国声学学会杂志》92卷,782 - 787页],其中在高强度窄带噪声之后,强度的刚可察觉差异(jnds)对于中等强度音调最大,而对于柔和与响亮音调则较小。一种假设是,这种中等强度峰值反映了低自发放电率(SR)神经元对强度编码的贡献,这是基于低SR和高SR神经元从前掩蔽中的不同恢复情况[雷尔金和杜塞(1991年),《听觉研究》55卷,215 - 222页]。本研究进行了三个实验,刺激听觉系统的不同阶段,以试图确定中等强度峰值的外周和中枢起源。首先,在两名人工耳蜗(CI)聆听者中,前掩蔽器在强度辨别函数上产生了一个中等强度峰值,这表明毛细胞与第八对神经之间的突触可能与该峰值无关,因为它们被绕过且第八对神经被直接刺激。其次,在听觉脑干植入(ABI)聆听者中,前掩蔽器未产生中等强度峰值,但掩蔽后的jnds比无掩蔽器时更大。ABI聆听者中不存在中等强度峰值表明,该峰值的出现需要听觉神经传导中的生理机制,或耳蜗核的内在处理电路,或两者皆需。第三,在听力正常的聆听者中,同侧90 dB SPL的纯音前掩蔽器产生了一个中等强度峰值,这与使用窄带噪声掩蔽器时相似;而对侧前掩蔽器基本未产生中等强度峰值,这表明上橄榄复合体及更中枢部位的双耳相互作用可能与该峰值无关。