Schlauch R S, Clement B R, Ries D T, DiGiovanni J J
Department of Communication Disorders, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis 55455, USA.
J Acoust Soc Am. 1999 Feb;105(2 Pt 1):822-8. doi: 10.1121/1.426271.
Forward-masked intensity discrimination was measured as a function of level in experiments designed to reveal insights into the mechanism(s) underlying the midlevel elevation of the Weber fraction. The standard and maskers were 1.0-kHz tones that were separated by 100 ms. Performance was measured for listeners with normal hearing using an adaptive procedure. In experiment 1, intensity discrimination was measured in the presence of an ipsilateral masker (80 dB SPL), a contralateral masker (93 dB SPL), and a binaural (dichotic) masker produced by combining the ipsilateral and contralateral maskers. Listeners perceived only the contralateral masker in the binaural-masker condition. The contralateral masker produced a small midlevel elevation of the Weber fraction. The ipsilateral masker and the binaural masker produced a large, midlevel elevation of the Weber fraction. Experiment 2 found that a two-tone masker resulted in a reduction (improvement) in the Weber fraction for some conditions, but the midlevel elevation remained for all subjects in this cue-tone condition. Experiment 3 demonstrated that cross talk could not account for all of the masking observed with contralateral maskers. Taken together, the results suggest that a single complex mechanism or multiple mechanisms may be responsible for the masking seen in these experiments. On the basis of the cueing results, it is concluded that a portion of the masking is due to cognitive factors; however, a sensory mechanism cannot be ruled out for the remaining portion, based on the results of these experiments. Finally, a small but significant amount of masking due to contralateral maskers places the mechanism for this outcome central to the cochlear nucleus.
在旨在深入了解韦伯分数中等水平升高背后机制的实验中,前掩蔽强度辨别被测量为声级的函数。标准音和掩蔽音均为1.0 kHz的纯音,间隔100毫秒。使用自适应程序对听力正常的受试者进行测试。在实验1中,分别在同侧掩蔽音(80 dB SPL)、对侧掩蔽音(93 dB SPL)以及由同侧和对侧掩蔽音组合而成的双耳(双耳分听)掩蔽音条件下测量强度辨别。在双耳掩蔽音条件下,受试者仅能感知到对侧掩蔽音。对侧掩蔽音使韦伯分数出现了较小的中等水平升高。同侧掩蔽音和双耳掩蔽音则使韦伯分数出现了较大的中等水平升高。实验2发现,在某些条件下,双音掩蔽音会导致韦伯分数降低(改善),但在这种提示音条件下,所有受试者的中等水平升高仍然存在。实验3表明,串扰无法解释对侧掩蔽音所观察到的所有掩蔽现象。综合来看,结果表明单一复杂机制或多种机制可能导致了这些实验中出现的掩蔽现象。根据提示结果得出结论,部分掩蔽是由认知因素引起的;然而,基于这些实验结果,不能排除剩余部分存在感觉机制的可能性。最后,对侧掩蔽音产生的少量但显著的掩蔽现象表明,耳蜗核是导致这一结果的核心机制。