Zeng F G
Department of Auditory Implants and Perception, House Ear Institute, Los Angeles, California 90057, USA.
J Acoust Soc Am. 1998 Apr;103(4):2021-30. doi: 10.1121/1.421373.
Intensity coding mechanisms are explored in a paradigm involving both forward and simultaneous masking. For intensity discrimination of 1000-Hz pure tone in quiet, a near-miss to Weber's law is observed. However, as more stimulus components are added to this relatively simple experiment, interactions among components produce a more complex pattern of results. An intense forward masker, while not causing any threshold shift for the test tone, produces a nonmonotonic intensity discrimination function ["the midlevel hump," Zeng et al., Hearing Res. 55, 223-230 (1991)]. The midlevel hump can be removed by the presence of additional notched noise [Plack and Viemeister, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 92, 1902-1910 (1992)] or narrow-band noise whose level is increased along with the test tone's standard level. The same midlevel hump can also be enhanced by a fixed-low-level notched noise or a high-level, high-pass noise which causes minimal masking at the test frequency. Interactions of forward masking and simultaneous masking present a serious problem for a clear interpretation of these results. For example, the notched noise was originally intended to restrict off-frequency listening, but on-frequency masking compromised this original purpose and confounded the interpretation of the notched noise effects. By measuring systematically the growth-of-masking functions, the present study identified various interactions of forward and simultaneous masking and clarified the role of off-frequency listening in forward-masked intensity discrimination. Both peripheral and central mechanisms may have contributed to the occurrence, reduction and enhancement of the midlevel hump under these masking conditions.
在一个涉及前向掩蔽和同时掩蔽的范式中探索强度编码机制。对于在安静环境中1000赫兹纯音的强度辨别,观察到对韦伯定律的近似偏离。然而,随着更多刺激成分被添加到这个相对简单的实验中,成分之间的相互作用产生了更复杂的结果模式。一个强烈的前向掩蔽声,虽然不会导致测试音的任何阈值变化,但会产生一个非单调的强度辨别函数["中级峰值",曾等人,《听觉研究》55,223 - 230(1991)]。中级峰值可以通过额外的带凹口噪声[普拉克和维梅斯特,《美国声学学会杂志》92,1902 - 1910(1992)]或其电平随测试音的标准电平增加的窄带噪声的存在而消除。相同的中级峰值也可以通过固定低电平的带凹口噪声或在测试频率处产生最小掩蔽的高电平高通噪声来增强。前向掩蔽和同时掩蔽的相互作用给这些结果的清晰解释带来了严重问题。例如,带凹口噪声最初旨在限制非频率聆听,但频率上的掩蔽损害了这一原始目的并混淆了对带凹口噪声效应的解释。通过系统测量掩蔽函数的增长,本研究确定了前向掩蔽和同时掩蔽之间的各种相互作用,并阐明了非频率聆听在前向掩蔽强度辨别中的作用。在这些掩蔽条件下,外周和中枢机制可能都对中级峰值的出现、减少和增强起到了作用。