Suppr超能文献

老年人的姿势描记法与平衡问题。

Posturography and balance problems in older people.

作者信息

Baloh R W, Spain S, Socotch T M, Jacobson K M, Bell T

机构信息

Department of Neurology, UCLA School of Medicine 90024-1769, USA.

出版信息

J Am Geriatr Soc. 1995 Jun;43(6):638-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1995.tb07198.x.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine which measurements and test conditions on posturography are most useful for identifying balance problems in older people.

SUBJECTS

Two samples of 70 community-dwelling older subjects (> 75 years). One group (controls) considered their balance normal for their age, and the other (patients) complained of imbalance.

MEASUREMENTS

Velocity of sway on static (with and without foam) and dynamic posturography, Tinetti gait and balance score, self-reported fear of falling, and number and circumstances of falls.

RESULTS

Mean sway velocity was significantly increased in patients compared with controls. The greatest difference between patients and controls occurred with measures of anterior-posterior sway velocity during angular tilt of the platform. Sway velocity was not significantly increased in patients or controls who reported falls compared with those who did not report falls. Even when comparing those who fell as a result of loss of balance with those who fell because of trips or slips, there was no significant difference in sway velocity. By contrast, those who reported fear of falling (patients and controls) had significantly increased sway velocity compared with those who did not report fear of falling.

CONCLUSION

On average, velocity of sway (particularly in the anterior-posterior direction) is higher in older subjects who complain of imbalance compared with age-matched controls, and the difference is greater with dynamic posturography than with static posturography. However, the posturography data provided little information about the cause of the imbalance and did not correlate with the frequency of reported falls.

摘要

目的

确定姿势描记术中哪些测量方法和测试条件对识别老年人的平衡问题最有用。

对象

两组共70名社区居住的老年人(年龄>75岁)。一组(对照组)认为自己的平衡与其年龄相符,另一组(患者组)则抱怨存在不平衡。

测量方法

静态(有泡沫和无泡沫)和动态姿势描记术中的摇摆速度、Tinetti步态和平衡评分、自我报告的跌倒恐惧以及跌倒次数和情况。

结果

与对照组相比,患者组的平均摇摆速度显著增加。患者组和对照组之间最大的差异出现在平台角倾斜期间前后摇摆速度的测量中。与未报告跌倒的患者或对照组相比,报告跌倒的患者或对照组的摇摆速度没有显著增加。即使将因平衡丧失而跌倒的人与因绊倒或滑倒而跌倒的人进行比较,摇摆速度也没有显著差异。相比之下,报告有跌倒恐惧的人(患者组和对照组)与未报告有跌倒恐惧的人相比,摇摆速度显著增加。

结论

平均而言,与年龄匹配的对照组相比,抱怨不平衡的老年受试者的摇摆速度(尤其是前后方向)更高,并且动态姿势描记术比静态姿势描记术的差异更大。然而,姿势描记术数据几乎没有提供关于不平衡原因的信息,并且与报告的跌倒频率无关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验