Medlicott N J, Tucker I G, Rathbone M J, Holborow D W
School of Pharmacy, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
J Periodontal Res. 1995 Mar;30(2):144-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0765.1995.tb01264.x.
Two methods for the determination of sample volumes between 0.2 and 0.6 microliters were compared by preparing standard curves for volumes over this range. The first method used a Periotron and the second the sample mass. A linear model was fitted and 95% confidence limits for volumes estimated by each method were calculated. This showed that use of either the maximum Periotron reading or the sample mass allowed estimation of volumes to within +/- 0.056 microliter and +/- 0.047 microliter respectively. It is proposed that measurement of sample mass provides a simple and accurate method to determine sample volume when analysing drug concentrations at specific sites in the oral cavity.
通过制备该范围内体积的标准曲线,比较了两种测定0.2至0.6微升样品体积的方法。第一种方法使用牙周测量仪,第二种方法使用样品质量。拟合了线性模型,并计算了每种方法估计体积的95%置信限。结果表明,使用牙周测量仪的最大读数或样品质量分别可将体积估计在±0.056微升和±0.047微升范围内。建议在分析口腔特定部位的药物浓度时,测量样品质量提供了一种简单准确的测定样品体积的方法。