Suppr超能文献

[一项使用 N-异丙基-p-[123I]碘安非他明(IMP)和单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPECT)的放射自显影(ARG)方法测量局部脑血流量(rCBF)的研究——查找表(TLU)法与 ARG 法之间 rCBF 值的比较,以及作为动脉血采样替代方法的静脉血采样评估]

[A study of rCBF measurement with autoradiography (ARG) method using N-isopropyl-p-[123I]iodoamphetamine (IMP) and SPECT--comparison of rCBF values between look-up table (TLU) and ARG methods, and evaluation of venous blood samplings as a substitute for arterial blood sampling].

作者信息

Saito K, Murata H, Maruno H, Okuda I

机构信息

Division of Nuclear Medicine, Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo.

出版信息

Kaku Igaku. 1995 Apr;32(4):405-12.

PMID:7776547
Abstract

Regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) values obtained by the TLU method with two 123I-IMP SPECT scans and one point arterial blood sampling and rCBF obtained by the ARG method with one 123I-IMP SPECT scan and fixed distribution volume (Vd) values were compared in 17 cases. A case with post ischemic hyperperfusion or luxury perfusion was not observed in our cases. The correlation coefficients between rCBF values and Vd values obtained by the TLU method were 0.49 (p < 0.001) in 184 ROI without hypoactive areas on the early image, and 0.61 (p < 0.001) in 207 ROI with hypoactive areas, respectively. A high rCBF value with a low Vd value was not observed in any region. Mean Vd value was 44.0 +/- 7.0 (mean +/- SD) in all regions. The correlation coefficients between rCBF values using the TLU method and those using the ARG method with Vd fixed at 44 and 50 were also 0.98. Error of the rCBF value was larger in the region of high rCBF, however, noticeable error of the rCBF value was not observed in the ARG method. The ARG method is more convenient for quantifying rCBF. Venous blood radioactivity at 10 min after 123I-IMP infusion was smaller than arterial blood radioactivity, and the blood activity in the distal vein was larger than that in the proximal vein. The ratio of venous blood activity to arterial blood activity was 0.92 +/- 0.04 (mean +/- SD) at the back of the hand, however, the ratio was a variant in each case. Arterial sampling was thought to be a reliable method to obtain more stable and precise rCBF.

摘要

在17例患者中,比较了通过双次123I-IMP SPECT扫描和一次动脉血采样的TLU方法获得的局部脑血流量(rCBF)值,以及通过单次123I-IMP SPECT扫描和固定分布容积(Vd)值的ARG方法获得的rCBF。在我们的病例中未观察到缺血后高灌注或过度灌注的情况。在早期图像上无低活性区域的184个感兴趣区(ROI)中,通过TLU方法获得的rCBF值与Vd值之间的相关系数为0.49(p<0.001),在有低活性区域的207个ROI中,相关系数为0.61(p<0.001)。在任何区域均未观察到rCBF值高而Vd值低的情况。所有区域的平均Vd值为44.0±7.0(平均值±标准差)。当Vd固定为44和50时,使用TLU方法获得的rCBF值与使用ARG方法获得的rCBF值之间的相关系数也为0.98。然而,在高rCBF区域,rCBF值的误差较大,而在ARG方法中未观察到明显的rCBF值误差。ARG方法在定量rCBF方面更方便。123I-IMP注入后10分钟时静脉血放射性低于动脉血放射性,远端静脉的血活性高于近端静脉。手背处静脉血活性与动脉血活性之比为0.92±0.04(平均值±标准差),然而,该比值在每个病例中均有变化。动脉采样被认为是获得更稳定和精确rCBF的可靠方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验