Ito H, Ishii K, Atsumi H, Inukai Y, Abe S, Sato M, Kinoshita T, Kawashima R, Ono S, Fukuda H
Department of Nuclear Medicine and Radiology, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.
Ann Nucl Med. 1995 Nov;9(4):185-190. doi: 10.1007/BF03168399.
N-isopropyl-p-[123I]iodoamphetamine (IMP) has been commonly used as a cerebral blood flow tracer, but, significant clearance of IMP from the brain to the blood causes underestimation of cerebral blood flow (CBF) as compared with true CBF when the conventional microsphere model method is applied. Previously, we reported an "Autoradiography method" (ARG method) for measuring CBF by using IMP in which this clearance effect was corrected. This method was based on a two-compartment model (influx: K1, efflux: k2, K1/k2 = distribution volume of IMP (Vd)), the K1 (corresponding to CBF) being obtained form the table which showed a correlation between CBF and the brain counts of SPECT scan with a constant Vd value. Arterial input data used were obtained by one point blood sampling 10 min after IMP infusion against the standard input function. In the present study, the ARG method was compared with the table look-up method (TLU method) and the conventional microsphere model method (MS method) for 30 subjects. When the Vd value in the ARG method was assumed to be 50 ml/ml, CBF values obtained by the ARG method were correlated well with those obtained by the TLU method (Y = 1.04X-2.5; X: TLU, Y: ARG r = 0.97) and those obtained by the MS method (Y = 0.82X + 12.1; X: ARG, Y: MS, r = 0.84). But, when the Vd value was assumed to be more or less than 50 ml/ml, ARG method CBF were under- or overestimated compared with the TLU method. This indicated that the ARG method could be a reliable method for CBF measurement if the Vd was determined properly. CBF values obtained by the MS method were actually 13.2% higher than those obtained by the ARG method against previous studies. As reasons for this, errors in the effects of gray-white matter mixture in the ARG method and in estimation of the SPECT brain counts at 8 min in the MS method were considered.
N-异丙基-p-[123I]碘安非他明(IMP)一直被广泛用作脑血流量示踪剂,但是,与应用传统微球模型方法时的真实脑血流量相比,IMP从脑到血液的显著清除会导致脑血流量(CBF)的低估。此前,我们报道了一种使用IMP测量CBF的“放射自显影法”(ARG法),其中这种清除效应得到了校正。该方法基于双室模型(流入:K1,流出:k2,K1/k2 = IMP的分布容积(Vd)),K1(对应于CBF)通过表格获得,该表格显示了在恒定Vd值下CBF与SPECT扫描脑计数之间的相关性。所使用的动脉输入数据是在IMP输注后10分钟通过单点采血获得的,对照标准输入函数。在本研究中,对30名受试者将ARG法与查表法(TLU法)和传统微球模型法(MS法)进行了比较。当ARG法中的Vd值假定为50 ml/ml时,ARG法获得的CBF值与TLU法获得的CBF值相关性良好(Y = 1.04X - 2.5;X:TLU,Y:ARG,r = 0.97)以及与MS法获得的CBF值相关性良好(Y = 0.82X + 12.1;X:ARG,Y:MS,r = 0.84)。但是,当Vd值假定为或多或少不同于50 ml/ml时,与TLU法相比,ARG法的CBF被低估或高估。这表明如果Vd确定得当,ARG法可能是一种可靠的CBF测量方法。与先前研究相比,MS法获得的CBF值实际上比ARG法获得的CBF值高13.2%。对此的原因,考虑了ARG法中灰质-白质混合效应的误差以及MS法中8分钟时SPECT脑计数估计的误差。