Suppr超能文献

麦芽糊精和淀粉对液体摄入的刺激作用。

Stimulation of fluid intake by maltodextrins and starch.

作者信息

Ramirez I

机构信息

Monell Chemical Senses Center, Philadelphia, PA 19104-3308, USA.

出版信息

Physiol Behav. 1995 Apr;57(4):687-92. doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(94)00330-0.

Abstract

Maltodextrin solutions are more potent stimulators of fluid intake than are starch suspensions, even though these two substances are both glucose polymers. When rats were offered a choice of two fluids, one containing maltodextrin and the other containing the same concentration of starch, rats preferred maltodextrin; this preference increased over successive days for rats given 7.4% or 10% carbohydrate but not for rats given 1% carbohydrate. Rats offered fluids containing artificial flavors mixed with maltodextrin and starch acquired preferences for flavors paired with 10% or 7.4% maltodextrin but not for flavors paired with 1% maltodextrin. In an attempt to determine whether this greater preference for maltodextrin is due to an innate flavor preference, rats were given a choice of maltodextrin containing sucrose octaacetate vs. plain starch; these rats initially preferred starch but subsequently ingested more maltodextrin flavored with sucrose octaacetate than plain starch. Direct evidence for a postingestive factor was obtained by giving rats intragastric infusions of either maltodextrin, starch, or vehicle whenever they drank a dilute saccharin solution. Both carbohydrates stimulated fluid intake, but maltodextrin did so more rapidly (within 1 day rather than the 2 days of training required with starch infusions). These results indicate that some difference in the postingestive effects of maltodextrin and starch contributes to the greater intake-stimulating effect of maltodextrin. The postingestive factor responsible for the difference between maltodextrin and starch has not been identified, but it is not the amount of utilizable energy because rats prefer maltodextrin over starch even when the starch suspension contains more calories than does the maltodextrin solution. It is proposed that the postingestive factor differentiating these substances is rate of digestion.

摘要

尽管麦芽糊精溶液和淀粉悬浮液这两种物质都是葡萄糖聚合物,但麦芽糊精溶液比淀粉悬浮液更能有效刺激液体摄入。当给大鼠提供两种液体供其选择时,一种含有麦芽糊精,另一种含有相同浓度的淀粉,大鼠更喜欢麦芽糊精;对于给予7.4%或10%碳水化合物的大鼠,这种偏好会在连续几天中增加,但对于给予1%碳水化合物的大鼠则不会。给大鼠提供含有与麦芽糊精和淀粉混合的人工香料的液体,它们会对与10%或7.4%麦芽糊精配对的香料产生偏好,但对与1%麦芽糊精配对的香料则不会。为了确定对麦芽糊精的这种更大偏好是否是由于先天的风味偏好,给大鼠提供含有蔗糖八乙酸酯的麦芽糊精与普通淀粉供其选择;这些大鼠最初更喜欢淀粉,但随后摄入的添加了蔗糖八乙酸酯的麦芽糊精比普通淀粉更多。通过在大鼠饮用稀释糖精溶液时给它们胃内注入麦芽糊精、淀粉或赋形剂,获得了关于摄食后因素的直接证据。两种碳水化合物都能刺激液体摄入,但麦芽糊精的刺激作用更快(在1天内,而淀粉注入则需要2天的训练时间)。这些结果表明,麦芽糊精和淀粉在摄食后效应上的某些差异导致了麦芽糊精更大的摄入刺激作用。造成麦芽糊精和淀粉之间差异的摄食后因素尚未确定,但不是可利用能量的量,因为即使淀粉悬浮液所含热量比麦芽糊精溶液多,大鼠仍然更喜欢麦芽糊精。有人提出,区分这些物质的摄食后因素是消化速率。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验