Ramirez I
Monell Chemical Senses Center, Philadelphia, PA 19104-3308.
Physiol Behav. 1994 Feb;55(2):355-60. doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(94)90146-5.
The present studies examined rats' responses to two maltodextrin preparations. One maltodextrin, a maltooligosaccharide, had an average chain length of 4.4 glucose units. The other maltodextrin was a maltopolysaccharide, having an average chain length of 22. In 24-h preference tests, rats strongly preferred 1% and 5% maltodextrin over water, regardless of the type of maltodextrin offered. When given a choice of two maltodextrins, rats preferred the maltooligosaccharide, but the degree of preference was influenced by the rats' previous experience with maltodextrins. Conditioned flavor aversion experiments were conducted to determine whether rats detect qualitative flavor differences between the these two maltodextrins. Rats trained to avoid one maltodextrin also avoided the other maltodextrin. Nevertheless, rats could be trained to drink maltooligosaccharide but avoid maltopolysaccharide; these rats showed no reliable tendency to respond to the intensity of maltooligosaccharide flavor. Therefore, maltodextrins of varying chain length differ more in flavor quality than in flavor intensity. This difference in flavor quality is not attributable to known sweet and starch flavors because neither maltodextrin contained much glucose and because rats trained to avoid the polysaccharide did not avoid starch. Because rats can discriminate between solutions containing only 0.5-1% maltodextrin, their ability to discriminate among carbohydrates must be far more acute than that of humans.
本研究考察了大鼠对两种麦芽糊精制剂的反应。一种麦芽糊精是麦芽低聚糖,平均链长为4.4个葡萄糖单位。另一种麦芽糊精是麦芽多糖,平均链长为22。在24小时偏好测试中,无论提供哪种类型的麦芽糊精,大鼠都强烈偏好1%和5%的麦芽糊精而非水。当让大鼠在两种麦芽糊精之间进行选择时,它们更喜欢麦芽低聚糖,但偏好程度受大鼠之前对麦芽糊精的体验影响。进行了条件性味觉厌恶实验,以确定大鼠是否能察觉到这两种麦芽糊精之间的质量风味差异。训练大鼠避免一种麦芽糊精后,它们也会避免另一种麦芽糊精。然而,大鼠可以被训练饮用麦芽低聚糖但避免麦芽多糖;这些大鼠对麦芽低聚糖风味强度的反应没有可靠的倾向。因此,不同链长的麦芽糊精在风味质量上的差异大于风味强度上的差异。这种风味质量的差异并非归因于已知的甜味和淀粉风味,因为两种麦芽糊精都不含太多葡萄糖,且训练避免多糖的大鼠并不避免淀粉。由于大鼠能够区分仅含0.5 - 1%麦芽糊精的溶液,它们区分碳水化合物的能力必定比人类敏锐得多。