• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

葡萄糖聚合物的味道对大鼠来说并非单一的。

Glucose polymer taste is not unitary for rats.

作者信息

Ramirez I

机构信息

Monell Chemical Senses Center, Philadelphia, PA 19104-3308.

出版信息

Physiol Behav. 1994 Feb;55(2):355-60. doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(94)90146-5.

DOI:10.1016/0031-9384(94)90146-5
PMID:8153178
Abstract

The present studies examined rats' responses to two maltodextrin preparations. One maltodextrin, a maltooligosaccharide, had an average chain length of 4.4 glucose units. The other maltodextrin was a maltopolysaccharide, having an average chain length of 22. In 24-h preference tests, rats strongly preferred 1% and 5% maltodextrin over water, regardless of the type of maltodextrin offered. When given a choice of two maltodextrins, rats preferred the maltooligosaccharide, but the degree of preference was influenced by the rats' previous experience with maltodextrins. Conditioned flavor aversion experiments were conducted to determine whether rats detect qualitative flavor differences between the these two maltodextrins. Rats trained to avoid one maltodextrin also avoided the other maltodextrin. Nevertheless, rats could be trained to drink maltooligosaccharide but avoid maltopolysaccharide; these rats showed no reliable tendency to respond to the intensity of maltooligosaccharide flavor. Therefore, maltodextrins of varying chain length differ more in flavor quality than in flavor intensity. This difference in flavor quality is not attributable to known sweet and starch flavors because neither maltodextrin contained much glucose and because rats trained to avoid the polysaccharide did not avoid starch. Because rats can discriminate between solutions containing only 0.5-1% maltodextrin, their ability to discriminate among carbohydrates must be far more acute than that of humans.

摘要

本研究考察了大鼠对两种麦芽糊精制剂的反应。一种麦芽糊精是麦芽低聚糖,平均链长为4.4个葡萄糖单位。另一种麦芽糊精是麦芽多糖,平均链长为22。在24小时偏好测试中,无论提供哪种类型的麦芽糊精,大鼠都强烈偏好1%和5%的麦芽糊精而非水。当让大鼠在两种麦芽糊精之间进行选择时,它们更喜欢麦芽低聚糖,但偏好程度受大鼠之前对麦芽糊精的体验影响。进行了条件性味觉厌恶实验,以确定大鼠是否能察觉到这两种麦芽糊精之间的质量风味差异。训练大鼠避免一种麦芽糊精后,它们也会避免另一种麦芽糊精。然而,大鼠可以被训练饮用麦芽低聚糖但避免麦芽多糖;这些大鼠对麦芽低聚糖风味强度的反应没有可靠的倾向。因此,不同链长的麦芽糊精在风味质量上的差异大于风味强度上的差异。这种风味质量的差异并非归因于已知的甜味和淀粉风味,因为两种麦芽糊精都不含太多葡萄糖,且训练避免多糖的大鼠并不避免淀粉。由于大鼠能够区分仅含0.5 - 1%麦芽糊精的溶液,它们区分碳水化合物的能力必定比人类敏锐得多。

相似文献

1
Glucose polymer taste is not unitary for rats.葡萄糖聚合物的味道对大鼠来说并非单一的。
Physiol Behav. 1994 Feb;55(2):355-60. doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(94)90146-5.
2
Stimulation of fluid intake by maltodextrins and starch.麦芽糊精和淀粉对液体摄入的刺激作用。
Physiol Behav. 1995 Apr;57(4):687-92. doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(94)00330-0.
3
Sucrose and fructose have qualitatively different flavors to rats.蔗糖和果糖对大鼠来说有着质的不同的味道。
Physiol Behav. 1994 Sep;56(3):549-54. doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(94)90300-x.
4
Is starch flavor unitary? Evidence from studies of cooked starch.淀粉风味单一吗?来自熟淀粉研究的证据。
Physiol Behav. 1992 Sep;52(3):535-40. doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(92)90343-z.
5
Starch flavor: apparent discrimination between amylopectin and amylose by rats.淀粉风味:大鼠对支链淀粉和直链淀粉的明显辨别
Physiol Behav. 1991 Dec;50(6):1181-6. doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(91)90580-h.
6
Pharmacology of flavor preference conditioning in sham-feeding rats: effects of naltrexone.假饲大鼠味觉偏好条件反射的药理学:纳曲酮的作用
Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1999 Nov;64(3):573-84. doi: 10.1016/s0091-3057(99)00124-0.
7
Stimulus specificity in flavor acceptance learning.味觉接受学习中的刺激特异性
Physiol Behav. 1996 Aug;60(2):595-610. doi: 10.1016/s0031-9384(96)80037-0.
8
Flavor preferences conditioned by sucrose depend upon training and testing methods: two-bottle tests revisited.由蔗糖调节的风味偏好取决于训练和测试方法:重新审视双瓶测试。
Physiol Behav. 2002 Aug;76(4-5):633-44. doi: 10.1016/s0031-9384(02)00785-0.
9
Maltodextrin and sucrose preferences in sweet-sensitive (C57BL/6J) and subsensitive (129P3/J) mice revisited.重新审视甜味敏感(C57BL/6J)和甜味不敏感(129P3/J)小鼠对麦芽糊精和蔗糖的偏好。
Physiol Behav. 2016 Oct 15;165:286-90. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2016.08.012. Epub 2016 Aug 12.
10
Critical role of amygdala in flavor but not taste preference learning in rats.
Eur J Neurosci. 2005 Oct;22(7):1767-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2005.04360.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Taste aversion learning during successive negative contrast.连续负对比期间的味觉厌恶学习。
Learn Behav. 2024 Sep;52(3):272-284. doi: 10.3758/s13420-024-00626-3. Epub 2024 Feb 8.
2
Maltodextrin and sucrose preferences in sweet-sensitive (C57BL/6J) and subsensitive (129P3/J) mice revisited.重新审视甜味敏感(C57BL/6J)和甜味不敏感(129P3/J)小鼠对麦芽糊精和蔗糖的偏好。
Physiol Behav. 2016 Oct 15;165:286-90. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2016.08.012. Epub 2016 Aug 12.
3
Impact of T1r3 and Trpm5 on carbohydrate preference and acceptance in C57BL/6 mice.
T1r3 和 Trpm5 对 C57BL/6 小鼠碳水化合物偏好和接受度的影响。
Chem Senses. 2013 Jun;38(5):421-37. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjt011. Epub 2013 Apr 1.
4
Opioid mediation of starch and sugar preference in the rat.大鼠淀粉和糖偏好的阿片介导作用。
Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2010 Oct;96(4):507-14. doi: 10.1016/j.pbb.2010.07.013. Epub 2010 Jul 23.
5
Amino acid and carbohydrate preferences in C57BL/6ByJ and 129P3/J mice.C57BL/6ByJ和129P3/J小鼠对氨基酸和碳水化合物的偏好
Physiol Behav. 2008 Jan 28;93(1-2):37-43. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2007.07.016. Epub 2007 Aug 8.