• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

规范基于性能的支撑面标准。

Standardizing performance-based criteria for support surfaces.

作者信息

Krouskop T, van Rijswijk L

出版信息

Ostomy Wound Manage. 1995 Jan-Feb;41(1):34-6, 38, 40-5.

PMID:7779232
Abstract

Due to the sparsity of prospective, controlled, clinical studies on the efficacy of and the lack of standardized information about support surfaces, current literature does not clearly define how these surfaces address patient needs. Standardization would help healthcare professionals make better informed decisions about the use of support surfaces. Standardization would also help researchers design and implement controlled, clinical studies by defining characteristics of surface evaluation, making it possible to replicate research activities. The first step toward standardization is to develop a performance-based set of criteria for classifying these surfaces. With respect to the three purposes identified: comfort, postural control and pressure management, only parameters that can be measured noninvasively, have been considered. The nine parameters are life expectancy of the surface, skin moisture control, skin temperature control, redistribution of pressure, product service requirements, fail safety, infection, flammability, and patient/product friction. Specific guidelines for each of these nine parameters are discussed in depth. With testing and evaluation of support surfaces standardized, clinicians will be able to choose a surface to meet the needs of patients the same way they make other treatment decisions: based on outcomes and the results of controlled, clinical studies.

摘要

由于前瞻性、对照性临床研究关于支撑面功效的资料稀少,且缺乏关于支撑面的标准化信息,当前文献并未明确界定这些支撑面如何满足患者需求。标准化将有助于医疗保健专业人员在使用支撑面方面做出更明智的决策。标准化还将有助于研究人员通过定义表面评估特征来设计和实施对照性临床研究,从而使重复研究活动成为可能。迈向标准化的第一步是制定一套基于性能的标准来对这些支撑面进行分类。对于所确定的三个目的:舒适度、姿势控制和压力管理,仅考虑了可以无创测量的参数。这九个参数分别是支撑面的预期寿命、皮肤湿度控制、皮肤温度控制、压力再分布、产品服务要求、故障安全、感染、易燃性以及患者/产品摩擦力。对这九个参数中的每一个都进行了深入讨论,并给出了具体指南。随着支撑面测试和评估的标准化,临床医生将能够像做出其他治疗决策一样,基于结果和对照性临床研究的结果来选择满足患者需求的支撑面。

相似文献

1
Standardizing performance-based criteria for support surfaces.规范基于性能的支撑面标准。
Ostomy Wound Manage. 1995 Jan-Feb;41(1):34-6, 38, 40-5.
2
Support surfaces: beds, mattresses, overlays-oh my!
Nurs Clin North Am. 2005 Jun;40(2):251-65. doi: 10.1016/j.cnur.2004.09.011.
3
Other considerations in selecting a support surface.
Adv Wound Care. 1997 Nov-Dec;10(7):37-42.
4
Body support testing and rating.
Hosp Mater Manage Q. 1992 Aug;14(1):63-78.
5
Laboratory measurement of the interface pressures applied by active therapy support surfaces: a consensus document.主动治疗支撑表面施加的界面压力的实验室测量:共识文件。
J Tissue Viability. 2010 Feb;19(1):2-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jtv.2009.11.010. Epub 2010 Jan 22.
6
Pressure and shear: their effects on support surface choice.压力与剪切力:它们对支撑面选择的影响。
Ostomy Wound Manage. 1995 Sep;41(8):36-8, 40-2, 44-5.
7
Impact of practice guidelines on support surface selection, incidence of pressure ulcers, and fiscal dollars.实践指南对支撑面选择、压疮发生率和财政支出的影响。
Ostomy Wound Manage. 2001 Mar;47(3):44-53.
8
A new tool for evaluating patient support surfaces. Part I: A guideline for making practice decisions.
Ostomy Wound Manage. 1991 Sep-Oct;36:51-4, 56-7, 59.
9
Pressure ulcer prevention: a randomized controlled trial of 2 risk-directed strategies for patient surface assignment.压疮预防:一项关于两种根据患者风险指导进行体位分配策略的随机对照试验
Adv Wound Care. 1999 Mar;12(2):72-80.
10
"Just Another Statistic".“只是又一个统计数字”
Oncologist. 1998;3(3):III-IV.

引用本文的文献

1
A technique to determine friction at the fingertips.一种测定指尖摩擦力的技术。
J Appl Biomech. 2008 Feb;24(1):43-50. doi: 10.1123/jab.24.1.43.
2
Evaluation of antidecubitus mattresses.防褥疮床垫的评估
Med Biol Eng Comput. 2005 Sep;43(5):541-7. doi: 10.1007/BF02351025.