Speirs R, Jewell J A
North West Anglia Health Commission, Peterborough.
Br J Gen Pract. 1995 Jan;45(390):31-3.
Despite limited evidence of their effectiveness, counsellors are increasingly being employed as part of the primary health care team. Evaluation of counsellor services is therefore important.
In 1990 the Cambridgeshire Family Health Services Authority initiated a pilot scheme to evaluate the role of counsellors in general practice and to help the authority determine its policy towards claims by general practitioners for reimbursement through the ancillary staff scheme.
Two group practices were identified and an external evaluator appointed. The evaluator and the general practitioners developed their aims and objectives for counselling in the general practice context, the number of counsellor hours per week and the type and process of referral. An experienced counsellor was appointed to work in both practices. Information was gathered over two years about doctors' reasons for referral, counsellor's initial assessment, patient outcome at the end of treatment, the patients' and practice teams' opinions about the counselling service, and patient outcome a year after counselling.
A total of 293 patients were referred in the first two years of the scheme, of whom 75% were women. The main reasons for referral were that the general practitioners considered the patients to be suffering from anxiety/stress (33%), interpersonal difficulties (33%) and depression (20%). Almost all referrals (98%) were considered by the counsellor to be appropriate. The counsellor was able to provide an assessment for the 248 patients who attended and either take on the case for short-term counselling (69%) or suggest referral to a more appropriate service (25%) (6% withdrew). The expected maximum of six sessions of 45 minutes duration per referral was achieved in 87% of cases. The service was valued by patients and doctors. It coped effectively with a high proportion of patients with problems who did not reappear as demand elsewhere in the practice, and achieved a reduction in dose of psychotropic drugs among those seen.
This study has shown the value of clarifying referral criteria and the intended role of the counsellor prior to the counsellor's introduction. This ensures effective use of a scarce resource and a high level of satisfaction among doctors and patients.
尽管其有效性的证据有限,但咨询师越来越多地被作为初级卫生保健团队的一部分聘用。因此,对咨询师服务进行评估很重要。
1990年,剑桥郡家庭健康服务管理局启动了一项试点计划,以评估咨询师在全科医疗中的作用,并帮助管理局确定其对全科医生通过辅助人员计划申请报销的政策。
确定了两个团体医疗诊所,并任命了一名外部评估员。评估员与全科医生共同制定了他们在全科医疗环境中的咨询目标、每周咨询师的工作时长以及转诊的类型和流程。任命了一名经验丰富的咨询师在这两个诊所工作。在两年时间里收集了以下信息:医生的转诊原因、咨询师的初步评估、治疗结束时患者的结果、患者和医疗团队对咨询服务的意见以及咨询一年后患者的结果。
在该计划的前两年共转诊了293名患者,其中75%为女性。转诊的主要原因是全科医生认为患者患有焦虑/压力症(33%)、人际关系困难(33%)和抑郁症(20%)。咨询师认为几乎所有转诊(98%)都是合适的。咨询师能够为前来就诊的248名患者进行评估,要么接手进行短期咨询(69%),要么建议转诊至更合适的服务机构(25%)(6%退出)。87%的转诊病例达到了每次转诊最多六节45分钟时长课程的预期。该服务受到患者和医生的重视。它有效地应对了很大一部分有问题的患者,这些患者没有像诊所其他地方的需求那样再次出现,并且在接受治疗的患者中实现了精神药物剂量的减少。
本研究表明了在引入咨询师之前明确转诊标准和咨询师预期作用的价值。这确保了对稀缺资源的有效利用以及医生和患者的高度满意度。