Brada M, Thomas G, Elyan S, James N, Hines F, Ashley S, Marsh H, Bell B A, Stenning S
Neuro-oncology Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Trust, Sutton, Surrey, UK.
Br J Cancer. 1995 Jun;71(6):1330-4. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1995.258.
Radiotherapy, although clearly beneficial in patients with high-grade glioma, is largely palliative, and a protracted course of treatment may not be the most appropriate approach in the context of limited survival. We therefore assessed the feasibility, toxicity and survival results of a short accelerated radiotherapy regimen given twice daily over a period of 3 weeks. A total of 116 patients with high-grade glioma were treated with radiotherapy in a prospective study using an accelerated fractionation regimen. The total dose of 55 Gy was given in 32-36 fractions of 1.72-1.53 Gy, twice daily 5 days a week, with a minimum 6 h interval between fractions. Toxicity was assessed using Karnofsky performance status scale and in the later part of the study with the Barthel index. Survival data were compared with a control group treated with 60 Gy in 30 daily fractions in a previous MRC study, matched for known prognostic factors. The median survival of 116 patients treated with accelerated radiotherapy was 10 months. Survival comparison of accelerated patients with matched controls treated with conventional fractionation demonstrated a hazard ratio of 1.13 (95% confidence interval 0.85-1.51; P = 0.39). Early treatment toxicity was acceptable, with only seven patients developing transient decrease in performance status. The accelerated radiotherapy regimen was logistically feasible and acceptable to patients, carers and staff. Treatment time was reduced without apparent increase in early toxicity and there was no loss of survival benefit. The effectiveness and convenience of a short accelerated regimen makes this a suitable alternative to a 6 week course of radiotherapy in patients with high-grade glioma. However, a full randomised trial comparing conventional and accelerated radiotherapy may be required as proof of equivalence.
放射治疗虽然对高级别胶质瘤患者显然有益,但大多只是姑息性的,在生存期有限的情况下,延长疗程可能并非最合适的方法。因此,我们评估了一种在3周内每日两次的短程加速放射治疗方案的可行性、毒性和生存结果。在一项前瞻性研究中,共有116例高级别胶质瘤患者采用加速分割方案接受放射治疗。总剂量55 Gy分32 - 36次给予,每次1.72 - 1.53 Gy,每周5天,每天两次,两次分割之间至少间隔6小时。使用卡诺夫斯基功能状态量表评估毒性,在研究后期使用巴氏指数进行评估。将生存数据与先前一项医学研究委员会(MRC)研究中接受30次每日分割、总剂量60 Gy治疗的对照组进行比较,该对照组在已知预后因素方面进行了匹配。接受加速放疗的116例患者的中位生存期为10个月。加速放疗组患者与接受常规分割的匹配对照组的生存比较显示,风险比为1.13(95%置信区间0.85 - 1.51;P = 0.39)。早期治疗毒性是可接受的,只有7例患者的功能状态出现短暂下降。加速放疗方案在后勤方面是可行的,患者、护理人员和工作人员都可以接受。治疗时间缩短,早期毒性没有明显增加,也没有生存获益的损失。短程加速方案的有效性和便利性使其成为高级别胶质瘤患者6周放射治疗疗程的合适替代方案。然而,可能需要进行一项全面的随机试验来比较常规放疗和加速放疗,以证明两者等效。