Blais M A, Norman D K, Quintar B, Herzog D B
Psychology Office, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston 02114, USA.
J Clin Psychol. 1995 Jan;51(1):100-7. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(199501)51:1<100::aid-jclp2270510116>3.0.co;2-a.
This study compared two Rorschach administration methods across a number of test variables. With a within-subjects, counter-balanced design, 20 female subjects randomly received either an initial Rapaport (Rapaport, Gill, & Schafer, 1968) or an Exner (Exner, 1974, 1986) Rorschach administration. Results showed that the Exner administration produced significantly more Color (C), Shading (Shd), and Blend (B) responses than did the Rapaport administration. Intersystem differences were most prominent on the first presentation of the two administrations. The first Exner administration produced significantly more C, Shd, and Blend responses than did the first Rapaport administration. Findings are discussed in light of their clinical implications, limitations in the experimental design, and suggestions for improving future research.
本研究在多个测试变量上比较了两种罗夏墨迹测验的施测方法。采用被试内平衡设计，20名女性被试随机接受初始的拉帕波特式（拉帕波特、吉尔和谢弗，1968年）或艾克纳式（艾克纳，1974年、1986年）罗夏墨迹测验施测。结果显示，与拉帕波特式施测相比，艾克纳式施测产生的颜色（C）、阴影（Shd）和融合（B）反应显著更多。在两种施测的首次呈现中，系统间差异最为显著。首次艾克纳式施测产生的C、Shd和B反应比首次拉帕波特式施测显著更多。根据研究结果的临床意义、实验设计的局限性以及对改进未来研究的建议进行了讨论。
