Suppr超能文献

给药方式的效果:拉帕波特与埃克纳罗夏墨迹测验系统的比较

The effect of administration method: a comparison of the Rapaport and Exner Rorschach systems.

作者信息

Blais M A, Norman D K, Quintar B, Herzog D B

机构信息

Psychology Office, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston 02114, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Psychol. 1995 Jan;51(1):100-7. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(199501)51:1<100::aid-jclp2270510116>3.0.co;2-a.

Abstract

This study compared two Rorschach administration methods across a number of test variables. With a within-subjects, counter-balanced design, 20 female subjects randomly received either an initial Rapaport (Rapaport, Gill, & Schafer, 1968) or an Exner (Exner, 1974, 1986) Rorschach administration. Results showed that the Exner administration produced significantly more Color (C), Shading (Shd), and Blend (B) responses than did the Rapaport administration. Intersystem differences were most prominent on the first presentation of the two administrations. The first Exner administration produced significantly more C, Shd, and Blend responses than did the first Rapaport administration. Findings are discussed in light of their clinical implications, limitations in the experimental design, and suggestions for improving future research.

摘要

本研究在多个测试变量上比较了两种罗夏墨迹测验的施测方法。采用被试内平衡设计,20名女性被试随机接受初始的拉帕波特式(拉帕波特、吉尔和谢弗,1968年)或艾克纳式(艾克纳,1974年、1986年)罗夏墨迹测验施测。结果显示,与拉帕波特式施测相比,艾克纳式施测产生的颜色(C)、阴影(Shd)和融合(B)反应显著更多。在两种施测的首次呈现中,系统间差异最为显著。首次艾克纳式施测产生的C、Shd和B反应比首次拉帕波特式施测显著更多。根据研究结果的临床意义、实验设计的局限性以及对改进未来研究的建议进行了讨论。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验