Burns D R, Unger J W, Elswick R K, Beck D A
Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, USA.
J Prosthet Dent. 1995 Apr;73(4):354-63. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3913(05)80331-2.
Seventeen subjects with preexisting conventional complete dentures were evaluated in this prospective clinical study. Two implants were placed bilaterally in the anterior mandible. In a crossover experimental design, the conventional dentures were modified, and the retention, stability, and tissue response for conventional dentures were compared with implant overdentures that had O-ring and magnet overdenture attachments for all subjects. The study indicated statistical superiority of the implant overdenture to the conventional denture. The O-ring attachment proved significantly better than the magnet attachment for retention and stability. The soft tissue response showed a slight but significant improvement with implant overdenture therapy.
在这项前瞻性临床研究中,对17名佩戴传统全口义齿的受试者进行了评估。在下颌前部双侧植入两颗种植体。采用交叉实验设计,对传统义齿进行改良,并将所有受试者的传统义齿与带有O形环和磁性覆盖义齿附件的种植覆盖义齿在固位、稳定性和组织反应方面进行比较。研究表明种植覆盖义齿在统计学上优于传统义齿。对于固位和稳定性,O形环附件被证明明显优于磁性附件。种植覆盖义齿治疗使软组织反应有轻微但显著的改善。