Ciufo D, Dice S, Coles C
J Post Anesth Nurs. 1995 Jun;10(3):155-8.
The warming effects of a Blanketrol water coil-heated hypothermia blanket and a Bair Hugger forced-warm air warming blanket were compared. Thirty-two patients admitted to the PACU with temperatures 34.4 degrees C (94 degrees F) or lower were assigned to treatment with the Blanketrol (Cincinnati Sub-Zero Products, Cincinnati, OH) or the Bair Hugger (Augustine Medical, Eden Prairie, MN) in alternating fashion, and treatment continued until the patients' temperatures reached 36.1 degrees C (97 degrees F). Every half hour each patient's temperature was measured using a tympanic temperature device and recorded on the data collection sheet. Analysis of the findings showed that the forced-air warming blanket warmed patients to 36.1 degrees C (97 degrees F) or higher significantly faster than the water coil-heated blanket (P < .001).
对Blanketrol水盘管加热式低温毯和Bair Hugger强制热风加热毯的升温效果进行了比较。32名入住PACU且体温为34.4摄氏度（94华氏度）或更低的患者，被交替分配使用Blanketrol（辛辛那提零下产品公司，俄亥俄州辛辛那提）或Bair Hugger（奥古斯汀医疗公司，明尼苏达州伊甸草原）进行治疗，治疗持续到患者体温达到36.1摄氏度（97华氏度）。每隔半小时使用鼓膜体温计测量每位患者的体温，并记录在数据收集表上。研究结果分析表明，强制热风加热毯使患者体温升至36.1摄氏度（97华氏度）或更高的速度明显快于水盘管加热毯（P <.001）。
