Wetzel R
Macromolecular Sciences Department, SmithKline Beecham Pharmaceuticals, King of Prussia, PA 19406, USA.
J Mol Evol. 1995 May;40(5):545-50. doi: 10.1007/BF00166624.
The aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases exist as two enzyme families which were apparently generated by divergent evolution from two primordial synthetases. The two classes of enzymes exhibit intriguing familial relationships, in that they are distributed nonrandomly within the codon-amino acid matrix of the genetic code. For example, all XCX codons code for amino acids handled by class II synthetases, and all but one of the XUX codons code for amino acids handled by class I synthetases. One interpretation of these patterns is that the synthetases coevolved with the genetic code. The more likely explanation, however, is that the synthetases evolved in the context of an already-established genetic code--a code which developed earlier in an RNA world. The rules which governed the development of the genetic code, and led to certain patterns in the coding catalog between codons and amino acids, would also have governed the subsequent evolution of the synthetases in the context of a fixed code, leading to patterns in synthetase distribution such as those observed. These rules are (1) conservative evolution of amino acid and adapter binding sites and (2) minimization of the disruptive effects on protein structure caused by codon meaning changes.
氨酰-tRNA合成酶以两个酶家族的形式存在,它们显然是由两种原始合成酶通过趋异进化产生的。这两类酶呈现出有趣的家族关系,因为它们在遗传密码的密码子-氨基酸矩阵中并非随机分布。例如,所有XCX密码子编码的氨基酸由II类合成酶处理,除了一个XUX密码子外,所有XUX密码子编码的氨基酸由I类合成酶处理。对这些模式的一种解释是合成酶与遗传密码共同进化。然而,更有可能的解释是,合成酶是在已经建立的遗传密码背景下进化的——这种密码在RNA世界中更早出现。支配遗传密码发展并导致密码子与氨基酸之间编码目录中某些模式的规则,也会在固定密码的背景下支配合成酶的后续进化,从而导致合成酶分布出现如所观察到的那些模式。这些规则是:(1)氨基酸和衔接子结合位点的保守进化;(2)使密码子意义变化对蛋白质结构造成的破坏作用最小化。