• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

传达慢性预防性治疗的益处:疗效数据的形式会决定患者对治疗的接受程度吗?

Communicating the benefits of chronic preventive therapy: does the format of efficacy data determine patients' acceptance of treatment?

作者信息

Hux J E, Naylor C D

机构信息

Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Sunnybrook Health Science Centre, North York, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Med Decis Making. 1995 Apr-Jun;15(2):152-7. doi: 10.1177/0272989X9501500208.

DOI:10.1177/0272989X9501500208
PMID:7783576
Abstract

Patients' informed acceptance of chronic medical therapy hinges on communicating the potential benefits of drugs in quantitative terms. In a hypothetical scenario of treatment initiation, the authors assessed how three different formats of the same data affected the willingness of 100 outpatients to take what were implied to be three different lipid-lowering drugs. Side-effects were declared negligible and costs insured. Subjects make a "yes-no" decision about taking such a medication, and graded the decision on a certainty scale. Advised of a relative risk reduction--"34% reduction in heart attacks"--88% of the patients assented to therapy. All other formats elicited significantly more refusals (p < 0.0001): for absolute risk difference--"1.4% fewer patients had heart attacks"--42% assented; for inverted absolute risk--"treat 71 persons for 5 years to prevent one heart attack"--only 31% accepted treatment. When the data were extrapolated to disease-free survival--"average gain of 15 weeks"--40% consented. Similar responses were obtained for descriptions of an antihypertensive drug: 89% assented to therapy when given relative risk reduction but only 46% when given absolute risk reduction. The subjects were confident in both acceptance and refusal: 93% of the decisions were rated "somewhat certain" to "completely certain." The authors conclude that patients' views of medical therapy are shaped by the formats in which potential benefits are presented. Multiple complementary formats may be most appropriate. The results imply that many patients may decline treatment if briefed on the likelihood or extent of benefit.

摘要

患者对慢性药物治疗的知情接受程度取决于能否以量化方式传达药物的潜在益处。在一个假设的治疗起始场景中,作者评估了相同数据的三种不同呈现形式如何影响100名门诊患者服用三种不同降脂药物(暗示)的意愿。声明副作用可忽略不计且费用已承保。受试者对是否服用此类药物做出“是/否”决定,并在确定程度量表上对该决定进行评分。被告知相对风险降低——“心脏病发作风险降低34%”——88%的患者同意接受治疗。所有其他形式引发的拒绝明显更多(p<0.0001):对于绝对风险差异——“心脏病发作患者减少1.4%”——42%的患者同意;对于倒置绝对风险——“治疗71人5年可预防一次心脏病发作”——只有31%的患者接受治疗。当数据外推至无病生存期——“平均增加15周”——40%的患者同意。对于一种降压药物的描述也得到了类似的反应:给予相对风险降低时89%的患者同意接受治疗,但给予绝对风险降低时只有46%的患者同意。受试者对接受和拒绝都很有信心:93%的决定被评为“有点确定”到“完全确定”。作者得出结论,患者对药物治疗的看法受潜在益处呈现形式的影响。多种互补形式可能最合适。结果表明,如果向许多患者介绍获益的可能性或程度,他们可能会拒绝治疗。

相似文献

1
Communicating the benefits of chronic preventive therapy: does the format of efficacy data determine patients' acceptance of treatment?传达慢性预防性治疗的益处:疗效数据的形式会决定患者对治疗的接受程度吗?
Med Decis Making. 1995 Apr-Jun;15(2):152-7. doi: 10.1177/0272989X9501500208.
2
Different ways to describe the benefits of risk-reducing treatments: a randomized trial.描述降低风险治疗益处的不同方式:一项随机试验。
Ann Intern Med. 2007 Jun 19;146(12):848-56. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-146-12-200706190-00006.
3
Treatment decision-making and the form of risk communication: results of a factorial survey.治疗决策与风险沟通形式:析因调查结果
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2004 Nov 16;4:20. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-4-20.
4
Patients' responses to risk information about the benefits of treating hypertension.患者对高血压治疗益处的风险信息的反应。
Br J Gen Pract. 2001 Apr;51(465):276-9.
5
Who decides when to start preventive treatment? A questionnaire survey to compare the views of different population subgroups.谁来决定何时开始预防性治疗?一项比较不同人群亚组观点的问卷调查。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2003 Apr;57(4):241-2. doi: 10.1136/jech.57.4.241.
6
Alternative therapy use and adherence to antihyperlipidemic drugs in a lipid clinic.血脂门诊中替代疗法的使用及抗高脂血症药物的依从性
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2001 Jun 1;58(11):1017-21. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/58.11.1017.
7
Women's willingness to accept perceived risks for vasomotor symptom relief.女性为缓解血管舒缩症状而接受可感知风险的意愿。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2007 Sep;16(7):1028-40. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2006.0218.
8
Treatment effect expressed as the novel Delay of Event measure is associated with high willingness to initiate preventive treatment - A randomized survey experiment comparing effect measures.以新的事件延迟测量法表示的治疗效果与开始预防性治疗的高意愿相关——一项比较效果测量法的随机调查实验。
Patient Educ Couns. 2016 Dec;99(12):2005-2011. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2016.07.028. Epub 2016 Jul 28.
9
General Practitioners' coronary risk estimates, decisions to start lipid-lowering treatment, gender and length of clinical experience: their interactions in primary prevention.
Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2013 Oct;14(4):394-402. doi: 10.1017/S146342361200059X. Epub 2013 Jan 25.
10
Patients' preferences for ways to communicate benefits of cardiovascular medication.患者对心血管药物获益沟通方式的偏好。
Ann Fam Med. 2011 Mar-Apr;9(2):121-7. doi: 10.1370/afm.1193.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient perceptions around the use of clinico-pathologic and genomic tools in the management of early breast cancer.患者对临床病理和基因组工具在早期乳腺癌管理中应用的看法。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2025 Aug 21. doi: 10.1007/s10549-025-07797-1.
2
How Difference Tasks Are Affected by Probability Format, Part 2: A Making Numbers Meaningful Systematic Review.不同任务如何受到概率格式的影响,第2部分:一项使数字有意义的系统评价。
MDM Policy Pract. 2025 Feb 24;10(1):23814683241310242. doi: 10.1177/23814683241310242. eCollection 2025 Jan-Jun.
3
Scope, Methods, and Overview Findings for the Making Numbers Meaningful Evidence Review of Communicating Probabilities in Health: A Systematic Review.
《让数字有意义:健康领域概率沟通的循证综述》的范围、方法及概述性研究结果:一项系统综述
MDM Policy Pract. 2025 Feb 24;10(1):23814683241255334. doi: 10.1177/23814683241255334. eCollection 2025 Jan-Jun.
4
Historical Review of the Use of Relative Risk Statistics in the Portrayal of the Purported Hazards of High LDL Cholesterol and the Benefits of Lipid-Lowering Therapy.关于使用相对风险统计数据描述高LDL胆固醇的所谓危害及降脂治疗益处的历史回顾。
Cureus. 2023 May 1;15(5):e38391. doi: 10.7759/cureus.38391. eCollection 2023 May.
5
Postponement of Death by Statin Use: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.他汀类药物使用对死亡的推迟作用:随机临床试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Aug;34(8):1607-1614. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05024-4. Epub 2019 May 9.
6
Formal comment on "Systematic review of the predictors of statin adherence for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease".关于“他汀类药物预防心血管疾病一级预防的依从性预测因素的系统评价”的正式评论。
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 17;14(1):e0205138. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205138. eCollection 2019.
7
Length of time periods in treatment effect descriptions and willingness to initiate preventive therapy: a randomised survey experiment.治疗效果描述中时间段的长度和预防性治疗的意愿:一项随机调查实验。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2018 Nov 20;18(1):106. doi: 10.1186/s12911-018-0662-2.
8
Exploring health literacy and preferences for risk communication among medical oncology patients.探索医学肿瘤学患者的健康素养和风险沟通偏好。
PLoS One. 2018 Sep 18;13(9):e0203988. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203988. eCollection 2018.
9
Perceptions of health risks of cigarette smoking: A new measure reveals widespread misunderstanding.对吸烟健康风险的认知:一项新措施揭示了普遍存在的误解。
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 14;12(8):e0182063. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182063. eCollection 2017.
10
Time-based measures of treatment effect: reassessment of ticagrelor and clopidogrel from the PLATO trial.基于时间的治疗效果测量:来自PLATO试验的替卡格雷和氯吡格雷的重新评估
Open Heart. 2017 Jun 1;4(2):e000557. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2016-000557. eCollection 2017.