Miller M B, Chapman J P, Chapman L J, Collins J
Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin, Madison 53706, USA.
J Abnorm Psychol. 1995 May;104(2):251-8. doi: 10.1037//0021-843x.104.2.251.
Investigators of schizophrenic cognition often produce 2 or more tasks of differing difficulty levels by manipulating a variable that affects the accuracy of both normal and schizophrenic individuals; the investigators find that the variable also affects the difference between the groups in accuracy and conclude that the variable taps a schizophrenic differential deficit. An alternative hypothesis is that task differences in true-score variance artifactually produce the finding. For free-response tasks, group differences tend to be larger when difficulty is near 50%. The authors illustrate a new method of controlling this artifact by selecting items for hard and easy tasks on opposite sides of 50% difficulty and equidistant from it. Using this design with an anagram task, they found that schizophrenic and normal individuals differ no more on hard anagrams than on easy ones, and they propose the design for testing hypotheses concerning schizophrenic deficit on tasks that differ in difficulty.
精神分裂症认知方面的研究者常常通过操控一个影响正常人和精神分裂症患者准确性的变量,来设计两个或更多难度不同的任务;研究者发现该变量也会影响两组在准确性上的差异,并得出该变量反映了精神分裂症患者的差异缺陷这一结论。另一种假设是,真分数方差中的任务差异人为地导致了这一结果。对于自由反应任务,当难度接近50%时,组间差异往往更大。作者阐述了一种控制这种人为因素的新方法,即从难度50%的两侧选择难度相反且与50%等距的项目用于设计困难任务和简单任务。在一个字谜任务中采用这种设计,他们发现精神分裂症患者和正常人在困难字谜上的差异并不比在简单字谜上的差异更大,并且他们提出了这种设计用于检验有关不同难度任务中精神分裂症患者缺陷的假设。