Yale University, Department of Psychiatry, New Haven, CT, USA.
Psychiatry Res. 2010 Apr 30;176(2-3):120-5. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2009.08.006. Epub 2010 Mar 4.
Affect recognition (AR) is a core component of social information processing; thus, it may be critical to understanding social behavior and functioning in broader aspects of daily living. Deficits in AR are well documented in schizophrenia, but there is also evidence that many individuals with schizophrenia perform AR tasks at near-normal levels. In the current study, we sought to evaluate the functional significance of AR deficits in schizophrenia by comparing subgroups with normal-range and impaired AR performance on proxy and interviewer-rated measures of real-world functioning. Schizophrenia outpatients were classified as normal-range (N=17) and impaired (N=31) based on a logistic cut point in the sample distribution of Bell-Lysaker Emotion Recognition Task (BLERT) scores, referenced to a normative sample of healthy control subjects (N=56). The derived schizophrenia subgroups were then compared on proxy [University of California San Diego Performance-Based Skill Assessment (UPSA), Social Skills Performance Assessment (SSPA), Medication Management Ability Assessment (MMAA)] and interviewer-rated [Quality of Life Scale (QLS), Independent Living Skills Survey (ILSS)] measures of functioning, as well as a battery of neurocognitive tests. Initial analyses indicated superior MMAA and QLS performance in the near-normal AR subgroup. Covariate analyses indicated that group differences in neurocognition fully mediated the observed associations between AR and MMAA, and attenuated the observed relationships between AR classification and QLS. These results support three main conclusions. First, AR, like many other domains of psychopathology studied in schizophrenia, is preserved in select subgroups. Second, there is a positive relationship between AR performance and functional outcome measures. Third, neurocognition appears to mediate the relationship between AR and measures of functioning.
情感识别(AR)是社会信息处理的核心组成部分;因此,它对于理解社会行为和日常生活的更广泛方面的功能可能至关重要。在精神分裂症中,AR 缺陷得到了充分的证明,但也有证据表明,许多精神分裂症患者在 AR 任务中的表现接近正常水平。在当前的研究中,我们通过比较在代理和访谈者评定的现实生活功能测量中具有正常范围和受损 AR 表现的亚组,来评估精神分裂症中 AR 缺陷的功能意义。根据 Bell-Lysaker 情绪识别任务(BLERT)分数样本分布中的逻辑切点,将精神分裂症门诊患者分为正常范围(N=17)和受损(N=31)亚组,该切点参考了健康对照组(N=56)的正常样本。然后,根据代理[加利福尼亚大学圣地亚哥表现技能评估(UPSA)、社交技能表现评估(SSPA)、药物管理能力评估(MMAA)]和访谈者评定[生活质量量表(QLS)、独立生活技能调查(ILSS)]的功能测量,以及一系列神经认知测试,对得出的精神分裂症亚组进行比较。初步分析表明,在接近正常 AR 亚组中,MMAA 和 QLS 表现更好。协变量分析表明,认知的组间差异完全介导了 AR 与 MMAA 之间的观察到的关联,并且减弱了 AR 分类与 QLS 之间的观察到的关系。这些结果支持三个主要结论。首先,AR 与在精神分裂症中研究的许多其他心理病理学领域一样,在某些亚组中得到了保留。其次,AR 表现与功能结果测量之间存在正相关关系。第三,神经认知似乎介导了 AR 与功能测量之间的关系。