• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Ceftriaxone vs cefuroxime for infection prophylaxis in coronary bypass surgery.

作者信息

Sisto T, Laurikka J, Tarkka M R

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Tampere University Hospital, Finland.

出版信息

Scand J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1994;28(3-4):143-8. doi: 10.3109/14017439409099119.

DOI:10.3109/14017439409099119
PMID:7792559
Abstract

The most serious infection after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is mediastinitis following deep sternal wound infection. Antibiotic prophylaxis for at least 48 hours has been recommended. In this trial 551 consecutive patients were randomized to receive ceftriaxone in a single dose or cefuroxime thrice daily until the end of the second postoperative day. The overall infection rate was 7.7% in the ceftriaxone and 8.3% in the cefuroxime group, and the incidence of deep sternal infection was 2.9% in both groups. Significant risk factors for such infection were chronic respiratory disease (p < 0.001) and diabetes (p < 0.01). The antibiotic prophylaxis had no harmful effects on the colonic flora in either group. Acquisition and delivery costs for the prophylactic agents were three times higher in the cefuroxime than in the ceftriaxone group. Both antibiotics are concluded to be equally safe and effective. Single-dose ceftriaxone prophylaxis is as effective as cefuroxime given for 48 hours postoperatively. Single-dose ceftriaxone is also simple to use.

摘要

相似文献

1
Ceftriaxone vs cefuroxime for infection prophylaxis in coronary bypass surgery.
Scand J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1994;28(3-4):143-8. doi: 10.3109/14017439409099119.
2
The Importance of Perioperative Prophylaxis with Cefuroxime or Ceftriaxone in the Surgical Site Infections Prevention after Cranial and Spinal Neurosurgical Procedures.头孢呋辛或头孢曲松围手术期预防在颅脑和脊柱神经外科手术后手术部位感染预防中的重要性。
Pril (Makedon Akad Nauk Umet Odd Med Nauki). 2017 Sep 1;38(2):85-97. doi: 10.1515/prilozi-2017-0026.
3
[Single-dose ceftriaxone versus multiple-dose cefuroxime for prophylaxis of surgical site infection].单剂量头孢曲松与多剂量头孢呋辛预防手术部位感染的比较
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2003 May;41(5):372-4.
4
Antibiotic prophylaxis in high risk biliary surgery: one dose of ceftriaxone compared with two doses of cefuroxime.高危胆道手术中的抗生素预防:单剂量头孢曲松与两剂量头孢呋辛的比较。
Eur J Surg. 1991 Jun-Jul;157(6-7):403-5.
5
Prospective randomised comparison of single-dose versus multiple-dose cefuroxime for prophylaxis in coronary artery bypass grafting.冠状动脉搭桥术中单次剂量与多次剂量头孢呋辛预防效果的前瞻性随机对照研究。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1994 Dec;13(12):1033-7. doi: 10.1007/BF02111823.
6
Is single-dose antibiotic prophylaxis sufficient for coronary artery bypass surgery? An analysis of peri- and postoperative serum cefuroxime and vancomycin levels.单剂量抗生素预防对冠状动脉搭桥手术是否足够?围手术期及术后头孢呋辛和万古霉素血清水平分析。
J Hosp Infect. 1997 Nov;37(3):237-47. doi: 10.1016/s0195-6701(97)90252-8.
7
Serum concentrations of cefuroxime after continuous infusion in coronary bypass graft patients.
Ann Pharmacother. 2001 Apr;35(4):409-13. doi: 10.1345/aph.10174.
8
Single-dose ceftriaxone versus multiple-dose cefuroxime for antimicrobial chemoprophylaxis in pleuropulmonary surgery.
Panminerva Med. 1997 Sep;39(3):240-3.
9
Cefuroxime as antibiotic prophylaxis in coronary artery bypass grafting surgery.头孢呋辛作为冠状动脉搭桥手术中的抗生素预防用药。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2007 Aug;6(4):442-6. doi: 10.1510/icvts.2006.147769. Epub 2007 Apr 16.
10
Perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis in cardiovascular surgery. A prospective randomized trial comparing two day cefuroxime prophylaxis with four day cefazolin prophylaxis.心血管手术围手术期抗菌药物预防。一项前瞻性随机试验,比较头孢呋辛两日预防用药与头孢唑林四日预防用药。
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 1986 May-Jun;27(3):300-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Interventions to prevent surgical site infection in adults undergoing cardiac surgery.预防接受心脏手术的成人手术部位感染的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Dec 2;12(12):CD013332. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013332.pub2.
2
Systematic review of the cost-effectiveness of preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis in reducing surgical-site infection.术前使用抗生素预防手术部位感染的成本效益的系统评价
BJS Open. 2018 Apr 14;2(3):81-98. doi: 10.1002/bjs5.45. eCollection 2018 Jun.
3
A meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials assessing the prophylactic use of ceftriaxone. A study of wound, chest, and urinary infections.
一项评估头孢曲松预防性使用的随机对照试验的荟萃分析。一项关于伤口、胸部和尿路感染的研究。
World J Surg. 2009 Dec;33(12):2538-50. doi: 10.1007/s00268-009-0158-4.
4
Ceftriaxone versus Other Antibiotics for Surgical Prophylaxis : A Meta-Analysis.头孢曲松与其他抗生素用于手术预防:一项荟萃分析。
Clin Drug Investig. 2004;24(1):29-39. doi: 10.2165/00044011-200424010-00004.