Cain W S, Cometto-Muñiz J E
Department of Surgery, University of California, School of Medicine, San Diego 92103-8895, USA.
Occup Med. 1995 Jan-Mar;10(1):133-45.
Both irritation and odor figure prominently in complaints about indoor air. Irritation poses the greater problem since it arguably represents an adverse health effect per se and since its sources are often difficult to locate. There exist various potential assays for irritation, some better for validation of symptoms and some better for research on structure-activity relations. One animal assay, the respiratory depression technique, has produced measures of irritant potency in good accord with sensory psychophysical measurements in humans. Both the animal and human data point toward common physicochemical determinants of potency, especially for the weak irritants that often exist in indoor environments. For the foreseeable future, the assessment of odors in indoor environments will need to proceed as in the past, as a psychophysical measurement rather than as a chemical measurement. Methodologies for odor measurement continue to evolve. The evaluation of their usefulness in field settings must ultimately stand against a criterion of validity that has to date proved elusive to establish.
在有关室内空气的投诉中,刺激性和气味都非常突出。刺激性是更严重的问题,因为它本身就可被视为一种不良健康影响,而且其来源往往难以确定。存在各种针对刺激性的潜在检测方法,有些更适合验证症状,有些更适合研究构效关系。一种动物检测方法,即呼吸抑制技术,所产生的刺激效力测量结果与人类感官心理物理学测量结果高度一致。动物和人类数据都指向效力的共同物理化学决定因素,特别是对于室内环境中经常存在的弱刺激物。在可预见的未来,室内环境中气味的评估将需要像过去一样,作为一种心理物理学测量而非化学测量来进行。气味测量方法不断发展。它们在现场环境中的有用性评估最终必须以一个有效性标准为依据,而迄今为止这个标准难以确立。