Arts Josje H E, de Heer Cees, Woutersen Ruud A
TNO Quality of Life, P.O. Box 360, 3700 AJ Zeist, The Netherlands.
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2006 Apr;79(4):283-98. doi: 10.1007/s00420-005-0044-9. Epub 2005 Nov 8.
Chemosensory effects of stimulation by a chemical can either be irritating (trigeminal stimulation) or odorous (olfactory stimulation) or both. For odorous irritants, a clear-cut distinction between odour and irritation is difficult to make. The differences in the lowest concentration found to be irritating to the respiratory tract in humans when compared to experimental animals has brought much debate in the process of setting occupational exposure limits (OELs) for such chemicals. In this paper it will be discussed as to how far subjectively measured sensory irritation threshold levels can be used to establish OELs.
Data on respiratory irritation of four odorous irritants were retrieved from public literature and discussed, viz. acetone, formaldehyde, furfural and sulphur dioxide.
Objective measures of irritation yielded results that differed from subjective evaluations. Important factors modulating the reported levels of irritation and health symptoms include the perception of odour intensity, exposure history and the individual's bias to report irritation on the basis of his/her prejudice or knowledge of the compound.
Subjective measures alone are less appropriate for establishing sensory irritation thresholds of odorous irritants and are, therefore, less suitable to establish OELs without supporting evidence. Objectively measured irritation in humans, the Alarie assay (an experimental animal test assessing the concentration that results in a 50% reduction of the breathing frequency) and repeated exposure studies in animals may be of help to study objective irritation. If subjective measurements are used to study sensory irritation, the study design should at least include: measurement of both incidence and severity determined at several concentrations, an appropriate (0 ppm) control condition, preferably a non-irritant odorant control exposure, validated questionnaires and correct concentration measurements.
化学物质刺激产生的化学感应效应既可以是刺激性的(三叉神经刺激),也可以是有气味的(嗅觉刺激),或者两者皆有。对于有气味的刺激物,很难明确区分气味和刺激。与实验动物相比,人类呼吸道受到刺激的最低浓度差异在设定此类化学物质的职业接触限值(OELs)过程中引发了诸多争议。本文将讨论主观测量的感觉刺激阈值水平在多大程度上可用于确定职业接触限值。
从公开文献中检索并讨论了四种有气味刺激物(即丙酮、甲醛、糠醛和二氧化硫)的呼吸道刺激数据。
刺激的客观测量结果与主观评估不同。调节报告的刺激水平和健康症状的重要因素包括气味强度的感知、接触史以及个体基于其对化合物的偏见或了解而报告刺激的倾向。
仅靠主观测量不太适合确定有气味刺激物的感觉刺激阈值,因此,在没有支持证据的情况下不太适合确定职业接触限值。对人类进行的客观测量刺激、阿拉里试验(一种评估导致呼吸频率降低50%的浓度的实验动物试验)以及对动物的重复接触研究可能有助于研究客观刺激。如果使用主观测量来研究感觉刺激,研究设计至少应包括:在几种浓度下确定发病率和严重程度的测量、适当的(0 ppm)对照条件、最好是无刺激性气味剂对照接触、经过验证的问卷以及正确的浓度测量。