Suppr超能文献

口服胺碘酮治疗心房颤动和心房扑动的疗效、安全性及转复的决定因素

Efficacy, safety, and determinants of conversion of atrial fibrillation and flutter with oral amiodarone.

作者信息

Tieleman R G, Gosselink A T, Crijns H J, van Gelder I C, van den Berg M P, de Kam P J, van Gilst W H, Lie K I

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Groningen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 1997 Jan 1;79(1):53-7. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(96)00675-3.

Abstract

Amiodarone is effective for long-term maintenance of sinus rhythm after electrical cardioversion of refractory atrial fibrillation or flutter. To examine its efficacy and safety for pharmacologic conversion of these arrhythmias, we studied 129 patients with refractory atrial fibrillation or flutter who had failed previous intensive conventional antiarrhythmic treatment. In anticipation of electrical cardioversion, patients were loaded with amiodarone, 600 mg/day during a 4-week period. The main outcome measure was pharmacologic conversion during this period. During the loading period, 23 patients (18%) converted to sinus rhythm. When analyzed in a multivariate model, conversion was related to desethylamiodarone plasma level (p = 0.0006), arrhythmia duration (p = 0.04), left atrial area (p = 0.02), and concomitant treatment with verapamil (p = 0.01). During ongoing atrial fibrillation after loading, the ventricular rate decreased from 100 +/- 25 to 87 +/- 27 beats/ min (p <0.001). Amiodarone appeared to be safe and did not have to be discontinued because of intolerable side effects. Thus, amiodarone loading is safe and is still able to convert refractory atrial fibrillation or flutter. Conversion is related to increased desethylamiodarone plasma levels and concomitant treatment with verapamil. Because prolonged loading may increase desethylamiodarone plasma concentrations, this may enhance efficacy and obviate the need for electrical cardioversion.

摘要

胺碘酮对难治性心房颤动或心房扑动电复律后窦性心律的长期维持有效。为了研究其对这些心律失常进行药物转复的疗效和安全性,我们研究了129例难治性心房颤动或心房扑动患者,这些患者先前强化常规抗心律失常治疗失败。预期进行电复律时,患者在4周期间负荷服用胺碘酮,600mg/天。主要结局指标是在此期间的药物转复。在负荷期间,23例患者(18%)转复为窦性心律。在多变量模型分析中,转复与去乙基胺碘酮血浆水平(p = 0.0006)、心律失常持续时间(p = 0.04)、左心房面积(p = 0.02)以及维拉帕米联合治疗(p = 0.01)有关。在负荷后持续心房颤动期间,心室率从100±25次/分钟降至87±27次/分钟(p<0.001)。胺碘酮似乎安全,且未因难以耐受的副作用而停药。因此,胺碘酮负荷是安全的,并且仍能够转复难治性心房颤动或心房扑动。转复与去乙基胺碘酮血浆水平升高以及维拉帕米联合治疗有关。由于延长负荷可能增加去乙基胺碘酮血浆浓度,这可能提高疗效并避免进行电复律的必要性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验