Hammond J M, Potgieter P D
Respiratory Intensive Care Unit, Groote Schuur Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa.
Anaesth Intensive Care. 1995 Apr;23(2):168-74. doi: 10.1177/0310057X9502300240.
The role of selective decontamination of the digestive tract (SDD) for the prevention of nosocomial infection in critically ill patients remains controversial, and the efficacy of this technique in patients who are already infected on presentation to the intensive care unit has not previously been assessed. We performed a double-blind randomized placebo controlled trial of SDD (parenteral cefotaxime, six-hourly oral and enteral polymyxin E, tobramycin, and amphotericin B vs placebo) for all infected patients presenting to the ICU requiring mechanical ventilation for more than 48 hours and ICU stay of more than 5 days. Daily clinical and microbiological monitoring for secondary infection was undertaken until hospital discharge. In all, 59 selective decontamination and 76 placebo fully comparable patients fulfilled criteria for enrollment and analysis (APACHE II 15.2 vs 15.1). The number of patients receiving SDD who developed nosocomial infections was significantly reduced (P = 0.048), and there were no infections caused by the enterobacteriaceae or Candida spp in this group. No difference in ICU (17.5 vs 18.8 days) or hospital stay (32.7 vs 34.2 days) or mortality (17% vs 22.3%) was shown. Critically ill, primarily infected patients are protected from nosocomial infection by the use of SDD.
消化道选择性去污(SDD)在预防重症患者医院感染中的作用仍存在争议,此前尚未评估该技术对入住重症监护病房时已感染患者的疗效。我们对所有入住重症监护病房、需要机械通气超过48小时且在重症监护病房停留超过5天的感染患者进行了一项双盲随机安慰剂对照试验,比较SDD(静脉注射头孢噻肟、每6小时口服和肠内给予多粘菌素E、妥布霉素和两性霉素B与安慰剂)的效果。在患者出院前,每天进行临床和微生物学监测以评估继发感染情况。共有59例接受SDD治疗和76例安慰剂治疗的完全可比患者符合入组和分析标准(急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统II评分为15.2对15.1)。接受SDD治疗的患者发生医院感染的数量显著减少(P = 0.048),且该组中没有由肠杆菌科或念珠菌属引起的感染。在重症监护病房停留时间(17.5天对18.8天)、住院时间(32.7天对34.2天)或死亡率(17%对22.3%)方面未显示出差异。使用SDD可保护重症且主要为感染的患者免受医院感染。