Baines D, Overton J H
Department of Anaesthesia, Royal Alexandra Hospital for Children, Camperdown, N.S.W.
Anaesth Intensive Care. 1995 Apr;23(2):191-5. doi: 10.1177/0310057X9502300212.
We undertook a survey of N.S.W. hospitals and tertiary paediatric hospitals in other States to determine their practice in relation to parental presence at induction of anaesthesia of children. There were 135 responses to 174 questionnaires. Twenty-one indicated that no children were anaesthetized at their institution and one was inadequately filled out. One hundred and thirteen questionnaires were assessed. Only 44% of departments had an official policy on parental attendance. A quarter of all hospitals described their facilities as entirely suitable, and a half compromised to allow parents to be present. The remaining quarter described their facilities as unsuitable. Overall, two-thirds of hospitals never or only sometimes had parents present at induction, and this applied equally to day stay patients and inpatients. Tertiary hospitals were more likely to have parents present, however they were more likely to have suitable facilities. The most common reason cited for parental attendance was parental expectation of being present, closely followed by the individual anaesthetist's philosophy. The most common reason for parents not attending was the individual anaesthetist's philosophy, followed by inadequate staffing.
