• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与对照患者相比,硅胶乳房植入物患者的血液硅水平是否升高?

Do patients with silicone-gel breast implants have elevated levels of blood silicon compared with control patients?

作者信息

Peters W, Smith D, Lugowski S, McHugh A, Baines C

机构信息

Division of Plastic Surgery, Wellesley Hospital, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Ann Plast Surg. 1995 Apr;34(4):343-7. doi: 10.1097/00000637-199504000-00001.

DOI:10.1097/00000637-199504000-00001
PMID:7793777
Abstract

Whole blood silicon levels in 30 patients with silicon-gel implants (inserted between 1973 and 1991) were compared with those of 24 healthy, age-matched, female patients without breast implants using atomic absorption spectrometry with a graphite furnace. The blood silicon levels in the implant patients were significantly higher than those of controls (medians 33.45 vs 17.05 ng/ml; p = 0.005). Of the 30 patients with implants, 15 had received their implants between 1973 and 1985, and 15 had received implants between 1986 and 1991. Implants made between 1973 and 1985 have been shown to be weaker and to have higher silicone "bleed" levels than those made from 1986 onward. However, there were no significant differences in the blood silicone levels between these two groups of patients.

摘要

采用石墨炉原子吸收光谱法,对30例植入硅胶假体(于1973年至1991年间植入)的患者的全血硅水平,与24例未植入乳房假体、年龄匹配的健康女性患者的全血硅水平进行了比较。植入假体患者的血硅水平显著高于对照组(中位数分别为33.45 ng/ml和17.05 ng/ml;p = 0.005)。在30例植入假体的患者中,15例于1973年至1985年间植入假体,15例于1986年至1991年间植入假体。已证实,1973年至1985年间生产的假体比1986年以后生产的假体更易损坏,且硅酮“渗漏”水平更高。然而,这两组患者的血硅酮水平并无显著差异。

相似文献

1
Do patients with silicone-gel breast implants have elevated levels of blood silicon compared with control patients?与对照患者相比,硅胶乳房植入物患者的血液硅水平是否升高?
Ann Plast Surg. 1995 Apr;34(4):343-7. doi: 10.1097/00000637-199504000-00001.
2
Elevated serum silicon levels in women with silicone gel breast implants.硅胶乳房植入女性血清硅水平升高。
Biol Trace Elem Res. 1995 May;48(2):121-30. doi: 10.1007/BF02789186.
3
Failure of 29Si NMR to detect increased blood silicon levels in silicone gel breast implant recipients.29Si核磁共振未能检测到硅胶乳房植入物受者血液中硅水平升高。
Anal Chem. 1995 Oct 15;67(20):3799-801. doi: 10.1021/ac00116a029.
4
Silicon assays in women with and without silicone gel breast implants--a review.有和没有硅胶乳房植入物的女性的硅含量检测——综述
Ann Plast Surg. 1999 Sep;43(3):324-30. doi: 10.1097/00000637-199909000-00020.
5
Silicon and silicone levels in patients with silicone implants.硅胶植入患者体内的硅和硅胶水平。
Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 1996;210:39-48. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-85226-8_4.
6
Analysis of silicon levels in capsules of gel and saline breast implants and of penile prostheses.凝胶和生理盐水乳房植入物以及阴茎假体胶囊中硅含量的分析。
Ann Plast Surg. 1995 Jun;34(6):578-84. doi: 10.1097/00000637-199506000-00003.
7
Serum silicon levels are elevated in women with silicone gel implants.植入硅胶乳房假体的女性血清硅水平升高。
Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 1996;210:59-65. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-85226-8_6.
8
Re: Do patients with silicone-gel breast implants have elevated levels of blood silicon compared with control patients?关于:与对照患者相比,硅胶乳房植入物患者的血液硅水平是否升高?
Ann Plast Surg. 1995 Oct;35(4):441-3. doi: 10.1097/00000637-199510000-00023.
9
Analysis of silicon in human tissues with special reference to silicone breast implants.人体组织中硅的分析,特别涉及硅酮乳房植入物。
J Trace Elem Med Biol. 2000 Apr;14(1):31-42. doi: 10.1016/S0946-672X(00)80021-8.
10
Silicone-specific blood lymphocyte response in women with silicone breast implants.接受硅胶乳房植入的女性体内针对硅胶的血液淋巴细胞反应。
Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 1994 Nov;1(6):689-95. doi: 10.1128/cdli.1.6.689-695.1994.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of Silicone Breast Implants on Human Cell Types In Vitro: A Closer Look on Host and Implant.硅酮乳房植入物对体外人类细胞类型的影响:宿主和植入物的更深入观察。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2022 Oct;46(5):2208-2217. doi: 10.1007/s00266-021-02762-x. Epub 2022 Jan 24.