Suppr超能文献

[胸段食管癌外科治疗的进展]

[Progress in surgical treatment of carcinoma of the intrathoracic esophagus].

作者信息

Kakegawa T, Yamana H

机构信息

First Dept. of Surgery, Kurume University School of Medicine.

出版信息

Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 1995 Jun;22(7):855-62.

PMID:7793992
Abstract

In the past 20 years, 403 patients with thoracic esophageal carcinoma underwent radical surgery. The aim of this study was to determine whether extended lymph node dissection improved the prognosis of these patients. All of the patients were divided into 4 groups every 5 years from group A to group D. Group A (n = 39) underwent radical esophagectomy with lower mediastinal and abdominal lymphadenectomy by the left thoracoabdominal approach. Majority cases in Group B (n = 94) also underwent radical esophagectomy with right upper, lower mediastinal and abdominal lymphadenectomy (incomplete 2-field dissection) by the right thoraco-abdominal approach. About 40% cases in Group C underwent radical esophagectomy with extended cervicothoraco-abdominal lymph node dissection (3-field dissection) and almost all of the others had radical esophagectomy with 2-field dissection. About 60% of the cases in group D underwent radical esophagectomy with 3-field dissection and the majority of the others had complete 2-field dissection (i.e.) radical lymphadenectomy around bilateral upper, lower mediastinal and abdominal lymph nodes. The five-year survival rate was 21% in group A, 23% in group B, 37% in group C and 55% in group D. The survival curve was improved according to the extent of lymph node dissection. Especially significant improvements of survival rate were found in group C and D compared with those in group A and B. Furthermore, group D showed significantly better survival than that of group C. Complete 2-field and 3-field dissection resulted in a better prognosis than incomplete 2-field dissection, while no significant difference in prognosis was found between complete 2-field and 3-field dissection. However, neither 2-field nor 3-field dissection resulted in improved prognosis in cases involving 7 or more positive lymph node metastases. These results suggest that radical esophagectomy and lymph node dissection involving bilateral upper mediastinal area are important factors to improve postoperative prognosis in patients with thoracic esophageal carcinoma. However, more effective adjuvant therapy is needed for the patients with many positive node metastases.

摘要

在过去20年中,403例胸段食管癌患者接受了根治性手术。本研究的目的是确定扩大淋巴结清扫是否能改善这些患者的预后。所有患者每5年分为一组,从A组到D组。A组(n = 39)采用左胸腹联合入路行根治性食管切除术及下纵隔和腹部淋巴结清扫术。B组(n = 94)的大多数病例也采用右胸腹联合入路行根治性食管切除术及右上、下纵隔和腹部淋巴结清扫术(不完全二野清扫)。C组约40%的病例行扩大颈胸腹淋巴结清扫术(三野清扫)根治性食管切除术,几乎所有其他病例行二野清扫根治性食管切除术。D组约60%的病例行三野清扫根治性食管切除术,其他大多数病例行完整的二野清扫(即双侧上、下纵隔和腹部淋巴结周围的根治性淋巴结清扫)。A组的五年生存率为21%,B组为23%,C组为37%,D组为55%。生存曲线根据淋巴结清扫范围得到改善。与A组和B组相比,C组和D组的生存率有显著提高。此外,D组的生存率明显优于C组。完整的二野和三野清扫比不完全二野清扫预后更好,而完整的二野和三野清扫在预后方面没有显著差异。然而,在有7个或更多阳性淋巴结转移的病例中,二野或三野清扫均未改善预后。这些结果表明,根治性食管切除术及双侧上纵隔区域的淋巴结清扫是改善胸段食管癌患者术后预后的重要因素。然而,对于有许多阳性淋巴结转移的患者,需要更有效的辅助治疗。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验