Bingham S A, Cassidy A, Cole T J, Welch A, Runswick S A, Black A E, Thurnham D, Bates C, Khaw K T, Key T J
MRC Dunn Clinical Nutrition Centre, Cambridge.
Br J Nutr. 1995 Apr;73(4):531-50. doi: 10.1079/bjn19950057.
Results from analysis of 24 h urine collections, verified for completeness with para-amino benzoic acid, and blood samples collected over 1 year were compared with 16 d weighed records of all food consumed collected over the year, and with results from 24 h recalls, food-frequency questionnaires and estimated food records in 160 women. Using the weighed records, individuals were sorted into quintiles of the distribution of the urine N excretion:dietary N intake ratio (UN:DN). UN exceeded DN in the top quintile of this ratio; mean ratio UN:DN = 1.13. Individuals in this top quintile were heavier, had significantly greater body mass indices, were reportedly more restrained eaters, had significantly lower energy intake:basal metabolic rate ratios (EI:BMR), and had correlated ratios of UN:DN and EI:BMR (r -0.62). Those in the top quintile reported lower intakes of energy and energy-yielding nutrients, Ca, fats, cakes, breakfast cereals, milk and sugars than individuals in the other quintiles but not lower intakes of non-starch polysaccharides, vitamin C, vegetables, potatoes or meat. Correlations between dietary intake from weighed records and 24 h urine K were 0.74 and 0.82, and between dietary vitamin C and beta-carotene and plasma vitamin C and beta-carotene 0.86 and 0.48. Correlations between dietary N intake from weighed records and 24 h urine excretion were high (0.78-0.87). Those between N from estimated food records and urine N were r 0.60-0.70. Correlations between urine N and 24 h recalls and food-frequency questionnaires were in the order of 0.01 to 0.5. Despite problems of underreporting in overweight individuals in 20% of this sample, weighed records remained the most accurate method of dietary assessment, and only an estimated 7 d diary was able to approach this accuracy.
对24小时尿液收集样本(用对氨基苯甲酸验证其完整性)以及一年中采集的血液样本的分析结果,与一年中收集的所有食用食物的16天称重记录进行了比较,并与160名女性的24小时回忆法、食物频率问卷及估计食物记录的结果进行了比较。利用称重记录,将个体按尿氮排泄量与膳食氮摄入量之比(UN:DN)的分布分为五个五分位数组。在该比例最高的五分位数组中,UN超过了DN;该比例的平均比值UN:DN = 1.13。处于该最高五分位数组的个体体重更重,体重指数显著更高,据报告饮食限制更严格,能量摄入量与基础代谢率之比(EI:BMR)显著更低,且UN:DN与EI:BMR呈相关关系(r = -0.62)。处于最高五分位数组的个体报告的能量及产能量营养素、钙、脂肪、蛋糕、早餐谷物、牛奶和糖的摄入量低于其他五分位数组的个体,但非淀粉多糖、维生素C、蔬菜、土豆或肉类的摄入量并不更低。称重记录的膳食摄入量与24小时尿钾之间的相关性分别为0.74和0.82,膳食维生素C和β-胡萝卜素与血浆维生素C和β-胡萝卜素之间的相关性分别为0.86和0.48。称重记录的膳食氮摄入量与24小时尿排泄量之间的相关性较高(0.78 - 0.87)。估计食物记录中的氮与尿氮之间的相关性r为0.60 - 0.70。尿氮与24小时回忆法及食物频率问卷之间的相关性在0.01至0.5之间。尽管该样本中20%的超重个体存在报告不足的问题,但称重记录仍是最准确的膳食评估方法,只有估计的7天饮食日记能够接近这一准确性。