Bond M J, Clark M S, Smith D S, Harris R D
Department of Primary Health Care, School of Medicine, Flinders University of South Australia, Adelaide.
Disabil Rehabil. 1995 Feb-Mar;17(2):63-9. doi: 10.3109/09638289509166629.
Recent work suggests that lifestyle can be considered using a 2 x 2 model of indoor/outdoor and work/leisure activities. This paper replicates the factor analysis of the Frenchay Activities Index (FAI) reported by Bond et al., using a group of subjects living independently in the community. Results confirmed empirically the existence of the four hypothesized dimensions of lifestyle. Further analyses demonstrated the construct validity of these dimensions by establishing their sensitivity to age, sex, domestic circumstances, and physical and cognitive status. We discuss ways in which various deficiencies in the FAI might be rectified in a revised index of activities designed to retain and clarify the four established dimensions of lifestyle. Future directions include the development of such an instrument, and its application as a rehabilitation outcome measure.
近期研究表明,可以使用室内/室外以及工作/休闲活动的2×2模型来考量生活方式。本文重复了邦德等人报告的对法恩赛活动指数(FAI)的因子分析,研究对象为一组独立生活在社区中的人群。结果通过实证证实了生活方式四个假设维度的存在。进一步分析通过确定这些维度对年龄、性别、家庭状况以及身体和认知状况的敏感性,证明了这些维度的结构效度。我们讨论了在旨在保留并阐明生活方式四个既定维度的修订活动指数中,如何纠正FAI的各种不足之处。未来的方向包括开发这样一种工具,并将其用作康复结果测量指标。