Cunningham D A, Paterson D H, Himann J E, Rechnitzer P A
Centre for Activity and Ageing, U. of Western Ontario, London.
Can J Appl Physiol. 1993 Sep;18(3):243-54. doi: 10.1139/h93-021.
The purpose of this study was to compare strength, flexibility, and cardiorespiratory fitness of the elderly living independently (n = 64) with those in rest or nursing homes (n = 61), and to identify those variables most strongly associated with an independent lifestyle. Quantitative levels of independence (Incapacity Index) and of activity were determined by questionnaires. Flexibility was measured using the Leighton Flexometer. Strength was measured using a modified sphygmomanometer. Cardiorespiratory fitness was measured using a self-paced walking test. Body size factors were also determined. Independent and dependent subjects were significantly different in age, which imposed a limitation on interpretation of these data. However, this factor was accounted for statistically in the analyses. Independent individuals compared to dependent ones showed significantly greater flexibility, activity levels, and choice of walking speed. Through multiple regression analysis, it was found that 40% of the variance in Incapacity Index was associated with participation in outdoor activities, greater shoulder flexibility, and a faster normal walking speed (> 1.0 m.s-1).
本研究旨在比较独立生活的老年人(n = 64)与居住在养老院或疗养院的老年人(n = 61)的力量、柔韧性和心肺适能,并确定与独立生活方式最密切相关的变量。通过问卷调查确定独立程度(失能指数)和活动的定量水平。使用利顿弯度计测量柔韧性。使用改良血压计测量力量。使用自定步速步行测试测量心肺适能。还确定了身体尺寸因素。独立和依赖受试者在年龄上有显著差异,这给这些数据的解释带来了限制。然而,在分析中已对该因素进行了统计学处理。与依赖个体相比,独立个体表现出显著更大的柔韧性、活动水平和步行速度选择。通过多元回归分析发现,失能指数40%的方差与参与户外活动、更大的肩部柔韧性以及更快的正常步行速度(>1.0米/秒)相关。