Aggarwal S P, Wander G S, Bala K, Kapoor D K
Department of Medicine, Dayanand Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana, Punjab.
Indian Heart J. 1994 Nov-Dec;46(6):307-9.
In this study of stress testing, the posture in which patients were put had effect on heart rate, blood pressure, rate pressure product and ST-segment depression integral in the recovery phase. The systolic blood pressure in recovery phase of stress testing fell more rapidly towards normal pre-exercise value in sitting (Group I) than in lying down (Group II) posture (p < 0.05) from 2nd to 5th minute. The changes in heart rate were less and slower in lying posture than with sitting up. The decrease in rate pressure product (RPP), a determinant of myocardial oxygen requirement was lower in lying down than in sitting up posture (p < 0.05) from 2nd to 5th minute of recovery. Consequently, ST-depression, a marker of ischaemia was more marked in lying down than sitting up. The ST-depression integral was 4.15 +/- 1.2 and 7.10 +/- 1.65 in 2nd minute in group I and group II respectively, and the difference was statistically significant in 2nd, 7th (p < 0.05) and 8th minute (p < 0.01) of recovery. These changes are important in interpretation of results of exercise testing.
在这项关于压力测试的研究中,患者所处的姿势对心率、血压、心率血压乘积以及恢复阶段的ST段压低积分有影响。压力测试恢复阶段的收缩压,从第2分钟到第5分钟,坐姿(第一组)比躺姿(第二组)更快地向运动前正常水平下降(p<0.05)。躺姿时心率的变化比坐姿时更小且更缓慢。从恢复的第2分钟到第5分钟,作为心肌需氧量决定因素的心率血压乘积(RPP)下降,躺姿比坐姿更低(p<0.05)。因此,作为缺血标志物的ST段压低,躺姿比坐姿更明显。第一组和第二组在第2分钟时ST段压低积分分别为4.15±1.2和7.10±1.65,在恢复的第2分钟、第7分钟(p<0.05)和第8分钟(p<0.01)差异具有统计学意义。这些变化对运动测试结果的解读很重要