• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同类型冠心病的长期预后:雷克雅未克研究

Long-term prognosis of different forms of coronary heart disease: the Reykjavik Study.

作者信息

Sigurdsson E, Sigfusson N, Agnarsson U, Sigvaldason H, Thorgeirsson G

机构信息

Heart Preventive Clinic, Reykjavik, Iceland.

出版信息

Int J Epidemiol. 1995 Feb;24(1):58-68. doi: 10.1093/ije/24.1.58.

DOI:10.1093/ije/24.1.58
PMID:7797357
Abstract

BACKGROUND

While coronary heart disease (CHD) is a serious and often fatal disease the prognosis is variable and major effort has been invested in risk stratification. The purpose of this study was to examine the relation between long-term prognosis and risk factors in different clinical categories of CHD.

METHODS

A general population sample of 9141 men, aged 34-79 at entry into the study was divided into six groups with respect to manifestations of CHD at entry: I. Symptomatic infarction. II. Silent or unrecognized infarction. III. Angina pectoris with ischaemic changes on ECG. IV. Angina without ischaemic changes. V. Angina by Rose questionnaire but not confirmed by a physician. VI. No manifestations of CHD.

RESULTS

The risk factor profile varied considerably between the different categories and by life-table analysis marked differences in survival were demonstrated between the groups. The risk factors maintained their detrimental effects on prognosis in the presence of CHD. Thus, age, serum total cholesterol, impaired glucose tolerance and smoking were found by Cox's regression to be statistically significant independent risk factors of CHD mortality among men having manifestations of CHD (groups I-V). Furthermore, the composite risk score, a measure of the overall risk factor exposures had marked effect on the prognosis of the various CHD groups. When the comprehensive risk factor score for both CHD mortality and all-cause mortality was accounted for marked differences persisted in the long-term prognosis. Compared to those without CHD the infarct groups had about a 7.6- and 3.7-fold risk of dying from CHD and all causes respectively. Those with angina had from 2.5- to 3.2-fold risk of CHD mortality and 1.7- to 2.2-fold risk of all-cause mortality depending on the subgroup of angina, again compared to those without manifestations of CHD.

CONCLUSION

Different categories of CHD had different risk factor profiles and the long-term prognosis resulted from a complex interplay between those factors and the diagnostic category of CHD. The risk factors maintained their detrimental effects on prognosis in the presence of CHD and after accounting for the comprehensive risk factor score marked differences persisted in the long-term prognosis, being worst for those having suffered a myocardial infarction, either symptomatic or silent.

摘要

背景

虽然冠心病(CHD)是一种严重且往往致命的疾病,但其预后存在差异,人们已在风险分层方面投入了大量精力。本研究的目的是探讨不同临床类型冠心病的长期预后与危险因素之间的关系。

方法

一项针对9141名男性的一般人群样本研究,研究开始时年龄在34 - 79岁,根据研究开始时冠心病的表现分为六组:I. 有症状的心肌梗死。II. 无症状或未被识别的心肌梗死。III. 心电图有缺血改变的心绞痛。IV. 无缺血改变的心绞痛。V. 根据罗斯问卷诊断为心绞痛但未得到医生证实。VI. 无冠心病表现。

结果

不同类别之间的危险因素特征差异很大,通过寿命表分析显示各组之间的生存存在显著差异。在患有冠心病的情况下,这些危险因素对预后仍有不利影响。因此,通过Cox回归发现,年龄、血清总胆固醇、糖耐量受损和吸烟是有冠心病表现的男性(I - V组)中冠心病死亡的统计学显著独立危险因素。此外,综合风险评分,一种衡量总体危险因素暴露情况的指标,对各种冠心病组的预后有显著影响。当考虑冠心病死亡率和全因死亡率的综合危险因素评分时,长期预后仍存在显著差异。与无冠心病者相比,梗死组死于冠心病和所有原因的风险分别约为7.6倍和3.7倍。根据心绞痛的亚组情况,心绞痛患者的冠心病死亡风险为2.5至3.2倍,全因死亡风险为1.7至2.2倍,同样与无冠心病表现者相比。

结论

不同类型的冠心病有不同的危险因素特征,长期预后是这些因素与冠心病诊断类型之间复杂相互作用的结果。在患有冠心病的情况下,这些危险因素对预后仍有不利影响,在考虑综合危险因素评分后,长期预后仍存在显著差异,对有症状或无症状心肌梗死患者最为不利。

相似文献

1
Long-term prognosis of different forms of coronary heart disease: the Reykjavik Study.不同类型冠心病的长期预后:雷克雅未克研究
Int J Epidemiol. 1995 Feb;24(1):58-68. doi: 10.1093/ije/24.1.58.
2
Prevalence of coronary heart disease in Icelandic men 1968-1986. The Reykjavik Study.1968 - 1986年冰岛男性冠心病患病率。雷克雅未克研究。
Eur Heart J. 1993 May;14(5):584-91. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/14.5.584.
3
Unrecognized myocardial infarction: epidemiology, clinical characteristics, and the prognostic role of angina pectoris. The Reykjavik Study.未识别的心肌梗死:流行病学、临床特征及心绞痛的预后作用。雷克雅未克研究。
Ann Intern Med. 1995 Jan 15;122(2):96-102. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-122-2-199501150-00003.
4
The natural history of prevalent ischaemic heart disease in middle-aged men.中年男性中普遍存在的缺血性心脏病的自然病史。
Eur Heart J. 2000 Jul;21(13):1052-62. doi: 10.1053/euhj.1999.1866.
5
Cardiovascular disease incidence and mortality in older men with diabetes and in men with coronary heart disease.老年糖尿病男性和冠心病男性的心血管疾病发病率及死亡率
Heart. 2004 Dec;90(12):1398-403. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2003.026104.
6
First coronary heart disease event rates in relation to major risk factors: Quebec cardiovascular study.与主要危险因素相关的首次冠心病事件发生率:魁北克心血管研究。
Can J Cardiol. 1990 Sep;6(7):274-80.
7
Natural history of myocardial infarction and angina pectoris in a general population sample of middle-aged men: a 16-year follow-up of the Primary Prevention Study, Göteborg, Sweden.中年男性普通人群样本中心肌梗死和心绞痛的自然病史:瑞典哥德堡初级预防研究的16年随访
J Intern Med. 1998 Dec;244(6):495-505. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.1998.00394.x.
8
Resting electrocardiogram and risk of coronary heart disease in middle-aged British men.中年英国男性静息心电图与冠心病风险
J Cardiovasc Risk. 1995 Dec;2(6):533-43.
9
Competing risk analysis of factors related to long-term incidence of CHD.冠心病长期发病相关因素的竞争风险分析
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2017 Jan;71(1):33-36. doi: 10.1136/jech-2016-207347. Epub 2016 Jul 18.
10
The association of angina pectoris with heart disease mortality among men and women by diabetes status: the Rancho Bernardo Study.心绞痛与糖尿病状况下男性和女性的心脏病死亡率之间的关联:Rancho Bernardo 研究。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2010 Aug;19(8):1433-9. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2009.1649.

引用本文的文献

1
Burden of risk factors in women and men with unrecognized myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis †.未识别心肌梗死患者中女性和男性的危险因素负担:系统评价和荟萃分析 † 。
Cardiovasc Res. 2024 Nov 25;120(14):1683-1692. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvae188.
2
Lipid profile and prognosis in patients with coronary heart disease: a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies.冠心病患者的血脂谱与预后:前瞻性队列研究的荟萃分析。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2021 Feb 3;21(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s12872-020-01835-0.
3
An optimal cardiothoracic ratio cut-off to predict clinical outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction.
心胸比值的最佳截断值可预测急性心肌梗死患者的临床结局。
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013 Dec;29(8):1889-97. doi: 10.1007/s10554-013-0260-4. Epub 2013 Jul 3.
4
Angina (chronic stable).心绞痛(慢性稳定型)
BMJ Clin Evid. 2008 Oct 1;2008:0213.
5
A population study of the long-term consequences of Rose angina: 20-year follow-up of the Renfrew-Paisley study.玫瑰心绞痛长期后果的人群研究:伦弗鲁-佩斯利研究的20年随访
Heart. 2006 Dec;92(12):1739-46. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2006.090118. Epub 2006 Jun 28.
6
Short-term and long-term outcomes in 133,429 emergency patients admitted with angina or myocardial infarction in Scotland, 1990-2000: population-based cohort study.1990 - 2000年苏格兰133429例因心绞痛或心肌梗死入院的急诊患者的短期和长期预后:基于人群的队列研究
Heart. 2006 Nov;92(11):1563-70. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2005.085399. Epub 2006 Jun 14.
7
Possible angina detected by the WHO angina questionnaire in apparently healthy men with a normal exercise ECG: coronary heart disease or not? A 26 year follow up study.通过世界卫生组织心绞痛问卷在运动心电图正常的貌似健康男性中检测到的可能心绞痛:是否为冠心病?一项26年的随访研究。
Heart. 2004 Jun;90(6):627-32. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2003.012542.
8
Prevention of coronary heart disease through treatment of infection with Chlamydia pneumoniae? Estimation of possible effectiveness and costs.通过治疗肺炎衣原体感染预防冠心病?对可能的有效性和成本的估计。
Health Care Manag Sci. 2001 Dec;4(4):269-79. doi: 10.1023/a:1011838211092.
9
Cost effectiveness of lowering cholesterol. Cost consequence analysis may be more useful to decision makers.降低胆固醇的成本效益。成本后果分析可能对决策者更有用。
BMJ. 1996 Nov 2;313(7065):1142; author reply 1144. doi: 10.1136/bmj.313.7065.1142.