Suppr超能文献

慢波睡眠和异相睡眠期间刺激偏差的脑加工:一项使用奇偶数范式对人类听觉诱发电位的研究

Brain processing of stimulus deviance during slow-wave and paradoxical sleep: a study of human auditory evoked responses using the oddball paradigm.

作者信息

Bastuji H, García-Larrea L, Franc C, Mauguière F

机构信息

Service de Neurologie Fonctionelle et Epileptologie, Hôpital Neurologique, Lyon, France.

出版信息

J Clin Neurophysiol. 1995 Mar;12(2):155-67. doi: 10.1097/00004691-199503000-00006.

Abstract

Auditory evoked potentials (AEPs) to frequent (90%) and deviant (10%) tones were recorded during both wakefulness and all-night sleep in eight drug-free volunteers. During presleep waking (10:00-11:00 p.m.), deviant stimuli elicited, in all subjects, a prominent "P300" wave of parieto-central topography, culminating at 344 ms (average), which was absent in response to frequent tones. This "presleep P300" was delayed and reduced relative to values obtained during full wakefulness (3:00-7:00 p.m.) in a control group. Passage from waking to sleep stage I was characterized by a progressive attenuation and delay of the P300 wave in response to deviant stimuli, without major changes in AEP morphology as compared to the waking state. Thus, in terms of cognitive evoked potentials (EPs), sleep stage I appeared more as a "weak" state of wakefulness than a true phase of sleep. During sleep stages II, III, and IV, both frequent and deviant tones evoked AEPs that closely resembled K-complexes. Responses to rare stimuli were four-to-five times larger than those to frequent tones, this likely being the result of K-complex habituation to monotonous stimuli. During paradoxical sleep (PS), AEP morphology again became comparable to that of wakefulness. Notably, a "P3" wave with similar topography as the waking P300 appeared in response to deviant stimuli exclusively. Thus, even though the brain seems able to detect stimulus deviance during all sleep stages, only during stage I and PS were the electrophysiological counterparts of deviance detection comparable to those of the waking state. Our results support the view that PS is not a state of "sensory isolation"; failure to respond to external stimuli during this stage may depend upon mechanisms occurring only after the sensory input has undergone cognitive analysis.

摘要

在8名未服用药物的志愿者清醒和整夜睡眠期间,记录了对频繁(90%)和偏差(10%)音调的听觉诱发电位(AEP)。在睡前清醒阶段(晚上10:00 - 11:00),偏差刺激在所有受试者中引发了一个顶中央地形的显著“P300”波,平均在344毫秒达到峰值,而对频繁音调的反应中则没有这个波。与对照组在完全清醒时(下午3:00 - 7:00)获得的值相比,这个“睡前P300”出现延迟且波幅减小。从清醒到睡眠第一阶段的过程中,对偏差刺激的P300波呈现出逐渐衰减和延迟的特征,与清醒状态相比,AEP形态没有重大变化。因此,就认知诱发电位(EP)而言,睡眠第一阶段似乎更像是一种“微弱”的清醒状态,而不是真正的睡眠阶段。在睡眠第二、三、四阶段,频繁和偏差音调都能诱发与K复合波非常相似的AEP。对罕见刺激的反应比对频繁音调的反应大四到五倍,这可能是K复合波对单调刺激产生习惯化的结果。在快速眼动睡眠(PS)期间,AEP形态再次变得与清醒时相当。值得注意的是,仅对偏差刺激出现了一个与清醒时P300地形相似的“P3”波。因此,尽管大脑似乎在所有睡眠阶段都能检测到刺激偏差,但只有在第一阶段和PS期间,偏差检测的电生理对应物才与清醒状态相当。我们的结果支持这样一种观点,即PS不是一种“感觉隔离”状态;在这个阶段对外界刺激无反应可能取决于仅在感觉输入经过认知分析之后才出现的机制。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验