Samson R A, Deal B J, Strasburger J F, Benson D W
Department of Pediatrics, Northwestern University, Children's Memorial Hospital, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995 Jul;26(1):159-63. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(95)00128-m.
This study sought to determine the accuracy of transesophageal electrophysiologic studies in diagnosing and characterizing various mechanisms of supraventricular tachycardia in pediatric patients.
Transesophageal electrophysiologic studies are a relatively noninvasive means of characterizing supraventricular tachycardia. Although widely used, to our knowledge no data exist that directly compare information obtained from transesophageal electrophysiologic studies with that from intracardiac electrophysiologic studies.
We reviewed the records of 57 pediatric patients undergoing both transesophageal and intracardiac electrophysiologic studies at our institution. The results of these studies were compared with respect to mechanism of tachycardia, localization of accessory atrioventricular (AV) connections (if present) and characterization of anterograde accessory connection conduction properties.
Tachycardia mechanisms were concordant in 56 of 57 patients: orthodromic reciprocating tachycardia in 43, antidromic reciprocating tachycardia in 1, both orthodromic and antidromic tachycardia in 2, AV node reentrant tachycardia in 5, atrial reentrant tachycardia in 4 and ectopic atrial tachycardia in 2. Of 29 patients with orthodromic reciprocating tachycardia using a concealed accessory connection, transesophageal study predicted the accessory connection site through changes induced by transient bundle branch block in 12. By the Bland-Altman method in 14 patients with pre-excitation, the anterograde accessory connection effective refractory period determined by transesophageal study compared favorably with that determined by intracardiac study (mean difference 5.0 ms, limits of agreement -55 and 65 ms).
Transesophageal electrophysiologic studies are a highly accurate means of diagnosing and characterizing various mechanisms of supraventricular tachycardia in pediatric patients.
本研究旨在确定经食管电生理检查在诊断和鉴别小儿室上性心动过速的各种机制方面的准确性。
经食管电生理检查是一种相对无创的室上性心动过速鉴别方法。尽管其应用广泛,但据我们所知,尚无数据直接比较经食管电生理检查与心内电生理检查所获信息。
我们回顾了在本机构接受经食管和心内电生理检查的57例小儿患者的记录。对这些检查结果在心动过速机制、房室旁道定位(若存在)及前传旁道传导特性鉴别方面进行了比较。
57例患者中有56例的心动过速机制一致:43例为顺向性折返性心动过速,1例为逆向性折返性心动过速,2例既有顺向性又有逆向性心动过速,5例为房室结折返性心动过速,4例为房内折返性心动过速,2例为异位房性心动过速。在29例使用隐匿性旁道的顺向性折返性心动过速患者中,经食管检查通过短暂束支阻滞诱发的变化预测出旁道部位的有12例。采用Bland-Altman方法,在14例预激患者中,经食管检查测定的前传旁道有效不应期与心内检查测定的结果相比具有良好的一致性(平均差异5.0毫秒,一致性界限为-55至65毫秒)。
经食管电生理检查是诊断和鉴别小儿室上性心动过速各种机制的一种高度准确的方法。