Hofmann T, Keck A, van Ingen G, Simic O, Ostermeyer J, Meinertz T
Medizinische Klinik, Abteilung Kardiologie, Universitätskliniken Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995 Jul;26(1):239-49. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(95)00157-u.
The aim of our study was to compare measurements of pulmonary venous flow velocity obtained either by transesophageal Doppler echocardiography or by intravascular catheter Doppler velocimetry. Furthermore, the relation among pulmonary venous flow velocity, left atrial compliance and left atrial pressure was evaluated.
Data about the relation between left atrial pressure and pulmonary venous flow velocity are controversial.
A total of 32 patients undergoing elective open heart surgery for coronary artery bypass grafting were included prospectively in the study. Pulmonary venous flow velocity (Doppler catheter) and left atrial pressure (microtip pressure transducer) were recorded simultaneously with recordings of pulmonary venous flow velocity obtained by transesophageal Doppler echocardiography.
Agreement between Doppler catheter and Doppler echocardiographic measurements of pulmonary venous flow velocity (n = 18 patients) was analyzed using the Bland-Altmann technique. The 95% limits of agreement were -0.16 to +0.11 m/s for systolic peak velocity, -0.14 to +0.09 m/s for diastolic peak velocity and -0.12 to +0.10 m/s for atrial peak velocity. The closest agreement between both methods was found for the ratio of systolic to diastolic peak velocity, the ratio of systolic to diastolic flow duration and the time from Q deflection on the electrocardiogram to maximal flow velocity. Mean left atrial pressure was strongly correlated with the ratio of systolic to diastolic peak velocity (r = -0.829), systolic velocity-time integral (r = -0.653), time to maximal flow velocity (r = 0.844) and the ratio of systolic to diastolic flow duration (r = -0.556). The ratio of systolic to diastolic peak velocity and the time to maximal flow velocity were identified as strong independent predictors of mean left atrial pressure. Left atrial compliance was not found to be an independent predictor of mean left atrial pressure.
Flow velocity in the left upper pulmonary vein can be reliably recorded by transesophageal pulsed wave Doppler echocardiography. Our data reveal further evidence that mean left atrial pressure can be estimated by the pattern of pulmonary venous flow velocity.
我们研究的目的是比较经食管多普勒超声心动图和血管内导管多普勒测速法所测得的肺静脉血流速度。此外,还评估了肺静脉血流速度、左心房顺应性和左心房压力之间的关系。
关于左心房压力与肺静脉血流速度之间关系的数据存在争议。
共有32例接受择期冠状动脉搭桥术心脏直视手术的患者被前瞻性纳入本研究。使用多普勒导管记录肺静脉血流速度,使用微尖端压力传感器记录左心房压力,同时记录经食管多普勒超声心动图所测得的肺静脉血流速度。
采用Bland-Altmann技术分析了18例患者的多普勒导管与多普勒超声心动图测量肺静脉血流速度的一致性。收缩期峰值速度的95%一致性界限为-0.16至+0.11m/s,舒张期峰值速度为-0.14至+0.09m/s,心房峰值速度为-0.12至+0.10m/s。两种方法之间在收缩期与舒张期峰值速度之比、收缩期与舒张期血流持续时间之比以及从心电图Q波到最大血流速度的时间方面一致性最佳。平均左心房压力与收缩期与舒张期峰值速度之比(r=-0.829)、收缩期速度时间积分(r=-0.653)、达到最大血流速度的时间(r=0.844)以及收缩期与舒张期血流持续时间之比(r=-0.556)密切相关。收缩期与舒张期峰值速度之比以及达到最大血流速度的时间被确定为平均左心房压力的强有力独立预测因素。未发现左心房顺应性是平均左心房压力的独立预测因素。
经食管脉冲波多普勒超声心动图可可靠记录左上肺静脉的血流速度。我们的数据进一步证明,平均左心房压力可通过肺静脉血流速度模式进行估计。