Suppr超能文献

血小板单采过程中反复白细胞损失对献血者的影响。

Effects on donors of repeated leukocyte losses during plateletpheresis.

作者信息

Strauss R G

机构信息

DeGowin Blood Center, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City 52242-1182.

出版信息

J Clin Apher. 1994;9(2):130-4. doi: 10.1002/jca.2920090208.

Abstract

All blood components collected by automated cytapheresis contain donor leukocytes. The possibility that repeated cytapheresis donation might lead to clinically important leukocyte losses and immunodeficiency has been a long-standing concern. Although convincing data do not exist to substantiate this concern, it is common practice to limit the number of annual cytapheresis donations per donor and to monitor donors for developing lymphocytopenia. Clinically significant immunodeficiency is unlikely to occur unless donors lose > 1 x 10(11) lymphocytes within a few weeks period of time or unless donor lymphocyte counts fall persistently to < 0.5 x 10(9)/L. Each plateletpheresis procedure, when performed using modern cell separators that are designed to produce a relatively "pure" platelet concentrate, leads to the loss of 1.0 x 10(6) to 5.0 x 10(7) leukocytes. Thus, automated plateletpheresis as performed in 1994 is extremely unlikely to cause clinically significant lymphocyte depletion and consequent immunodeficiency.

摘要

通过自动血细胞分离术采集的所有血液成分都含有供体白细胞。长期以来,人们一直担心重复进行血细胞分离术献血可能会导致临床上重要的白细胞损失和免疫缺陷。尽管尚无确凿数据证实这一担忧,但通常做法是限制每位供体每年进行血细胞分离术献血的次数,并监测供体是否出现淋巴细胞减少。除非供体在几周内损失超过1×10¹¹淋巴细胞,或者供体淋巴细胞计数持续降至<0.5×10⁹/L,否则不太可能发生具有临床意义的免疫缺陷。每次使用旨在生产相对“纯净”血小板浓缩物的现代细胞分离器进行血小板单采术时,都会导致1.0×10⁶至5.0×10⁷白细胞的损失。因此,1994年进行的自动血小板单采术极不可能导致具有临床意义的淋巴细胞耗竭及随之而来的免疫缺陷。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验