Suppr超能文献

头高位倾斜试验在评估血管迷走性晕厥患者治疗干预效果方面的局限性:依替福林与安慰剂对照研究的结果

Limitations of head-up tilt test for evaluating the efficacy of therapeutic interventions in patients with vasovagal syncope: results of a controlled study of etilefrine versus placebo.

作者信息

Moya A, Permanyer-Miralda G, Sagrista-Sauleda J, Carne X, Rius T, Mont L, Soler-Soler J

机构信息

Servei de Cardiologia, Hospital General Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995 Jan;25(1):65-9. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(94)00336-o.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study assessed the efficacy of oral etilefrine (10 mg three times a day) in preventing a positive response to head-up tilt testing.

BACKGROUND

Previous reports have suggested that oral etilefrine can be effective either in preventing a positive response to head-up tilt testing or in reducing syncopal recurrences in patients with vasovagal syncope. Up to now most studies assessing drug therapy in these patients have been uncontrolled.

METHODS

This was a randomized double-blind crossover study of etilefrine versus placebo in 30 consecutive patients with syncope and a baseline positive head-up tilt test. After the first test, patients had no treatment for 3 days and were randomized to receive etilefrine or placebo for 4 additional days. They underwent tilt testing under treatment and again after 3 days of washout; they then received the alternative treatment for 4 days, and a third test was performed.

RESULTS

Head-up tilt test results were negative in 13 (43%) patients with etilefrine and 15 (50%) with placebo (p = NS). Therefore, the statistical power of the study was only 10%. The rate of positive responses decreased with repeated testing irrespective of the assigned treatment: A positive response was obtained during the second head-up tilt test in 20 patients (10 with placebo, 10 with etilefrine) but in only 12 during the third (7 with etilefrine, 5 with placebo) (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Oral etilefrine (10 mg three times a day) was not superior to placebo in preventing a positive response to head-up tilt testing. Despite a low statistical power, the high rate of negative response with placebo (50%) suggests that controlled trials are needed to assess the real efficacy of any treatment in patients with vasovagal syncope.

摘要

目的

本研究评估口服依替福林(每日三次,每次10毫克)预防直立倾斜试验阳性反应的疗效。

背景

既往报告提示,口服依替福林在预防直立倾斜试验阳性反应或减少血管迷走性晕厥患者晕厥复发方面可能有效。迄今为止,评估这些患者药物治疗的大多数研究均未设对照。

方法

这是一项针对30例连续晕厥且直立倾斜试验基线为阳性的患者进行的依替福林与安慰剂的随机双盲交叉研究。首次试验后,患者3天不接受治疗,然后随机接受依替福林或安慰剂治疗4天。他们在治疗期间接受倾斜试验,洗脱3天后再次进行试验;然后接受另一种治疗4天,并进行第三次试验。

结果

接受依替福林治疗的13例(43%)患者和接受安慰剂治疗的15例(50%)患者直立倾斜试验结果为阴性(p=无统计学意义)。因此,该研究的统计学检验效能仅为10%。无论分配的治疗如何,阳性反应率随重复试验而降低:第二次直立倾斜试验时有20例患者出现阳性反应(10例接受安慰剂,10例接受依替福林),但第三次试验时仅12例(7例接受依替福林,5例接受安慰剂)(p<0.05)。

结论

口服依替福林(每日三次,每次10毫克)在预防直立倾斜试验阳性反应方面并不优于安慰剂。尽管统计学检验效能较低,但安慰剂的高阴性反应率(50%)表明,需要进行对照试验来评估任何治疗对血管迷走性晕厥患者的实际疗效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验