Truman P, Bergquist P L
J Bacteriol. 1976 Jun;126(3):1063-74. doi: 10.1128/jb.126.3.1063-1074.1976.
Some preparations of beta-galactosidase from strains of Escherichia coli carrying point mutations in their lacZ genes did not precipitate with antibody as effectively as wild-type enzyme, but did not appear to be chain-terminating mutations as judged by polarity measurements and suppression. Sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of crude extracts of induced Lac+ strains revealed that the monomer of beta-galactosidase ran as a band uncontaminated by other cellular proteins. This method was used to identify missense mutations in the alpha and beta portions of the lacZ gene. Six of 13 mutations investigated were judged to be missense by this criterion. Measurement of the degree of polarity, the ability to complement a nonsense mutation at the operator-distal extremity of the gene (omega-complementation), and suppressibility by 12 nonsense suppressors allowed the assignment of six other mutations as either number or ochre. The protein figments produced by these six nonsense mutations appeared to be degraded in vivo. One mutation that could not be classified was either a missense mutation whose protein product was degraded or a very leak nonsense mutation. Two lacZ alleles were suppressed by the ochre suppressors supM and supN, although they were missense by other criteria. The ability of supM to suppress both nonsense and missense mutations can be explained if it is derived from a tyrosine transfer ribonucleic acid with a modified base in the first position of the anticodon. The mutations assigned to the missense class were not suppressed by the missense suppressors supH, supQ, glyV, glyU, or glyT. Our results suggest that the criteria used in the past to distinguish between nonsense and missense mutations may not be conclusive even when used together.
从携带lacZ基因点突变的大肠杆菌菌株中制备的一些β-半乳糖苷酶制剂,与野生型酶相比,与抗体沉淀的效果不佳,但根据极性测量和抑制作用判断,似乎不是链终止突变。诱导的Lac⁺菌株粗提物的十二烷基硫酸钠-聚丙烯酰胺凝胶电泳显示,β-半乳糖苷酶的单体迁移为一条未被其他细胞蛋白污染的条带。该方法用于鉴定lacZ基因α和β部分的错义突变。根据这一标准,在研究的13个突变中有6个被判定为错义突变。通过测量极性程度、在基因操纵子远端末端互补无义突变的能力(ω互补)以及12种无义抑制子的抑制能力,可将其他6个突变判定为琥珀突变或赭石突变。这6个无义突变产生的蛋白质片段似乎在体内被降解。有一个无法分类的突变,要么是其蛋白质产物被降解的错义突变,要么是一个非常渗漏的无义突变。有两个lacZ等位基因被赭石抑制子supM和supN抑制,尽管根据其他标准它们是错义突变。如果supM源自反密码子第一位带有修饰碱基的酪氨酸转移核糖核酸,那么它能够抑制无义突变和错义突变的能力就可以得到解释。被归为错义类别的突变没有被错义抑制子supH、supQ、glyV、glyU或glyT抑制。我们的结果表明,过去用于区分无义突变和错义突变的标准,即使一起使用也可能没有定论。