• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新型口服头孢菌素的批判性综述。治疗中的考量及地位。

A critical review of the new oral cephalosporins. Considerations and place in therapy.

作者信息

Rodman D P, McKnight J T, Anderson R L

机构信息

Department of Clinical Pharmacy Practice, School of Pharmacy, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa.

出版信息

Arch Fam Med. 1994 Nov;3(11):975-80. doi: 10.1001/archfami.3.11.975.

DOI:10.1001/archfami.3.11.975
PMID:7804480
Abstract

Oral cephalosporins are key antimicrobials in the family physician's therapeutic armamentarium. The list of available agents within this class has been recently expanded to include cefixime, cefprozil, cefpodoxime proxetil, and loracarbef. Each of these antibiotics has differing antimicrobial coverage patterns and approved therapeutic uses. Compared with older, more established antimicrobials such as penicillin, amoxicillin, cefaclor, a combination of amoxicillin and clavulanate potassium, and erythromycin, the newer cephalosporins offer little, if any, therapeutic advantage. Clinical efficacy has been shown to be equal in virtually all studies comparing the newer cephalosporins with traditional agents for various community-acquired infections. While the four newer agents may be given less often, they are relatively expensive. In light of the available clinical data, the newer oral cephalosporins should be reserved as second- or third-line choices.

摘要

口服头孢菌素是家庭医生治疗药物中的关键抗菌药物。这类药物的可用清单最近已扩大,包括头孢克肟、头孢丙烯、头孢泊肟酯和氯碳头孢。这些抗生素中的每一种都有不同的抗菌覆盖模式和批准的治疗用途。与较老的、更成熟的抗菌药物如青霉素、阿莫西林、头孢克洛、阿莫西林和克拉维酸钾组合以及红霉素相比,新型头孢菌素几乎没有治疗优势。在几乎所有比较新型头孢菌素与传统药物治疗各种社区获得性感染的研究中,临床疗效已被证明是相同的。虽然这四种新型药物的给药频率可能较低,但它们相对昂贵。根据现有的临床数据,新型口服头孢菌素应保留作为二线或三线选择。

相似文献

1
A critical review of the new oral cephalosporins. Considerations and place in therapy.新型口服头孢菌素的批判性综述。治疗中的考量及地位。
Arch Fam Med. 1994 Nov;3(11):975-80. doi: 10.1001/archfami.3.11.975.
2
Comparison of cefprozil, cefpodoxime proxetil, loracarbef, cefixime, and ceftibuten.头孢丙烯、头孢泊肟酯、氯碳头孢、头孢克肟和头孢布烯的比较。
Ann Pharmacother. 1996 Mar;30(3):258-68. doi: 10.1177/106002809603000310.
3
The role of newer oral cephalosporins, fluoroquinolones, and macrolides in the treatment of pediatric infections.
Adv Pediatr Infect Dis. 1994;9:125-59.
4
Comparison of cefprozil with other antibiotic regimens in the treatment of children with acute otitis media.头孢丙烯与其他抗生素治疗方案在儿童急性中耳炎治疗中的比较。
Clin Infect Dis. 1992 Jun;14 Suppl 2:S204-8; discussion S209-11. doi: 10.1093/clinids/14.supplement_2.s204.
5
Antibacterial activity of cefpodoxime in comparison with cefixime, cefdinir, cefetamet, ceftibuten, loracarbef, cefprozil, BAY 3522, cefuroxime, cefaclor and cefadroxil.头孢泊肟与头孢克肟、头孢地尼、头孢他美、头孢布烯、氯碳头孢、头孢丙烯、BAY 3522、头孢呋辛、头孢克洛和头孢羟氨苄的抗菌活性比较。
Infection. 1991 Sep-Oct;19(5):353-62. doi: 10.1007/BF01645369.
6
Multi-investigator evaluation of the efficacy and safety of cefprozil, amoxicillin-clavulanate, cefixime and cefaclor in the treatment of acute otitis media.多位研究者对头孢丙烯、阿莫西林-克拉维酸、头孢克肟和头孢克洛治疗急性中耳炎的疗效和安全性进行的评估。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1994 Oct;13(10):857-65. doi: 10.1007/BF02111353.
7
In vitro susceptibility of Helicobacter pylori to the new oral cephalosporins cefpodoxime, ceftibuten and cefixime.幽门螺杆菌对新型口服头孢菌素头孢泊肟、头孢布烯和头孢克肟的体外敏感性。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1990 Sep;9(9):691-3. doi: 10.1007/BF01964274.
8
Choice of an oral beta-lactam antibiotic for infections due to penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae.用于治疗耐青霉素肺炎链球菌感染的口服β-内酰胺类抗生素的选择。
Scand J Infect Dis. 1997;29(3):255-7. doi: 10.3109/00365549709019038.
9
Switch therapy in community-acquired pneumonia.
Arch Intern Med. 1996 Jun 10;156(11):1235.
10
Comparative evaluation of cefixime versus amoxicillin-clavulanate following ceftriaxone therapy of pneumonia.肺炎患者头孢曲松治疗后头孢克肟与阿莫西林-克拉维酸的对比评估
Clin Pediatr (Phila). 1996 Dec;35(12):629-33. doi: 10.1177/000992289603501204.

引用本文的文献

1
Short-term effectiveness of ceftriaxone single dose in the initial treatment of acute uncomplicated pyelonephritis in women. A randomised controlled trial.头孢曲松单剂量在女性急性单纯性肾盂肾炎初始治疗中的短期疗效。一项随机对照试验。
Emerg Med J. 2002 Jan;19(1):19-22. doi: 10.1136/emj.19.1.19.
2
Activity of once-daily cefpodoxime regimens against Haemophilus influenzae and Streptococcus pneumoniae with an in vitro pharmacodynamic chamber model.采用体外药效学腔室模型研究每日一次头孢泊肟治疗方案对流感嗜血杆菌和肺炎链球菌的活性。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1996 Jun;40(6):1545-7. doi: 10.1128/AAC.40.6.1545.