Bouttier S, Andréassian B, Leseche G, Elman A, Hjiej M
Service de Chirurgie vasculaire et thoracique, Hôpital Beaujon, Clichy.
Chirurgie. 1993;119(6-7):305-14.
There is controversy over the choice of anaesthesia for carotid surgery. The aim of this retrospective study was to report the early results of carotid surgery performed with loco-regional anaesthesia by blockade of the cervical plexus. From 1987 to 1992, 405 consecutive operations on the carotid bifurcation were performed using this technique. Among these patients, 202 (50%) were asymptomatic, the indication being carotid narrowing of 80% or more, while clinical signs were observed in the other 203 patients (50%). According to the Sundt classification, 360 patients (89%) had a medical risk and 45 (11%) had a neurological risk. Occlusion of the controllateral internal carotid was present in 47 patients (12%). The deep blocade affected roots C2-C3-C4 followed by a superficial block using 0.5% Bupivacaine. An endarteriectomy was performed in 96% of the cases. In 10 (2.5%), there were complications or the cervical plexus blocade was insufficient: 6 caused the operation to be postponed and/or use of general anaesthesia, but none of these led to postoperative complication. In 35 patients (8.6%) neurological events during clamping required establishing a shunt (6.1% and 27.6% in cases with permeable or occluded controlateral carotids respectively). Neurological recovery was rapid and complete except in 4 cases. There were 8 central neurological complications which persisted or appeared postoperatively: 5 regressive ischaemic events, 2 persistent ischaemic events and one which led to the patient's death. No cardiac complications were seen. We conclude that blocade of the cervical plexus is a simple and effective technique for surgery of the carotid bifurcation. With this method, detection of clamp intolerance is more reliable and it gives enough time for endarteriectomy. The risk of coronarian complications is low due to good haemodynamic stability. This method is a low-cost technique and is better adapted to understanding the mechanisms of neurological complications.
颈动脉手术的麻醉选择存在争议。这项回顾性研究的目的是报告通过颈丛阻滞实施局部区域麻醉进行颈动脉手术的早期结果。1987年至1992年期间,连续405例采用该技术进行了颈动脉分叉手术。在这些患者中,202例(50%)无症状,指征为颈动脉狭窄80%或以上,而另外203例患者(50%)有临床症状。根据桑特分类,360例患者(89%)有医疗风险,45例(11%)有神经风险。47例患者(12%)存在对侧颈内动脉闭塞。深部阻滞影响C2 - C3 - C4神经根,随后使用0.5%布比卡因进行浅部阻滞。96%的病例进行了动脉内膜切除术。10例(2.5%)出现并发症或颈丛阻滞不足:6例导致手术推迟和/或使用全身麻醉,但均未导致术后并发症。35例患者(8.6%)在夹闭期间出现神经事件需要建立分流(对侧颈动脉通畅或闭塞的病例分别为6.1%和27.6%)。除4例外,神经功能恢复迅速且完全。术后有8例中枢神经系统并发症持续存在或出现:5例为进行性缺血事件,2例为持续性缺血事件,1例导致患者死亡。未观察到心脏并发症。我们得出结论,颈丛阻滞是一种用于颈动脉分叉手术的简单有效的技术。采用这种方法,对夹闭不耐受的检测更可靠,并且为动脉内膜切除术提供了足够的时间。由于良好的血流动力学稳定性,冠状动脉并发症的风险较低。这种方法成本低廉,更适合于了解神经并发症的机制。