Chen P, Ostrow B D, Tafuri S R, Chisholm R L
Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, Northwestern University Medical School, Chicago, Illinois 60611.
J Cell Biol. 1994 Dec;127(6 Pt 2):1933-44. doi: 10.1083/jcb.127.6.1933.
Conventional myosin has two different light chains bound to the neck region of the molecule. It has been suggested that the light chains contribute to myosin function by providing structural support to the neck region, therefore amplifying the conformational changes in the head following ATP hydrolysis (Rayment et al., 1993). The regulatory light chain is also believed to be important in regulating the actin-activated ATPase and myosin motor function as assayed by an in vitro motility assay (Griffith et al., 1987). Despite extensive in vitro biochemical study, little is known regarding RMLC function and its regulatory role in vivo. To better understand the importance and contribution of RMLC in vivo, we engineered Dictyostelium cell lines with a disrupted RMLC gene. Homologous recombination between the introduced gene disruption vector and the chromosomal RMLC locus (mlcR) resulted in disruption of the RMLC-coding region, leading to cells devoid of both the RMLC transcript and the 18-kD RMLC polypeptide. RMLC-deficient cells failed to divide in suspension, becoming large and multinucleate, and could not complete development following starvation. These results, similar to those from myosin heavy chain mutants (DeLozanne et al., 1987; Manstein et al., 1989), suggest the RMLC subunit is required for normal cytokinesis and cell motility. In contrast to the myosin heavy chain mutants, however, the mlcR cells are able to cap cell surface receptors following concanavilin A treatment. By immunofluorescence microscopy, RMLC null cells exhibited myosin localization patterns different from that of wild-type cells. The myosin localization in RMLC null cells also varied depending upon whether the cells were cultured in suspension or on a solid substrate. In vitro, purified RMLC- myosin assembled to form thick filaments comparable to wild-type myosin, but the filaments then exhibit abnormal disassembly properties. These results indicate that in vivo RMLC is necessary for myosin function.
传统肌球蛋白有两条不同的轻链与分子的颈部区域相连。有人提出,轻链通过为颈部区域提供结构支持来促进肌球蛋白的功能,从而放大ATP水解后头部的构象变化(雷蒙特等人,1993年)。调节性轻链也被认为在调节肌动蛋白激活的ATP酶和肌球蛋白运动功能方面很重要,这是通过体外运动分析来测定的(格里菲斯等人,1987年)。尽管进行了广泛的体外生化研究,但关于RMLC在体内的功能及其调节作用却知之甚少。为了更好地理解RMLC在体内的重要性和作用,我们构建了RMLC基因被破坏的盘基网柄菌细胞系。导入的基因破坏载体与染色体RMLC基因座(mlcR)之间的同源重组导致RMLC编码区被破坏,从而导致RMLC转录本和18-kD RMLC多肽均缺失。缺乏RMLC的细胞在悬浮培养时无法分裂,变得又大又多核,饥饿后也无法完成发育。这些结果与肌球蛋白重链突变体的结果相似(德洛赞内等人,1987年;曼斯坦等人,1989年),表明RMLC亚基是正常胞质分裂和细胞运动所必需的。然而,与肌球蛋白重链突变体不同的是,mlcR细胞在伴刀豆球蛋白A处理后能够使细胞表面受体帽化。通过免疫荧光显微镜观察,RMLC缺失细胞呈现出与野生型细胞不同的肌球蛋白定位模式。RMLC缺失细胞中的肌球蛋白定位也因细胞是在悬浮培养还是在固体基质上培养而有所不同。在体外,纯化的RMLC-肌球蛋白组装形成与野生型肌球蛋白相当的粗丝,但这些丝随后表现出异常的解聚特性。这些结果表明,在体内RMLC对肌球蛋白功能是必需的。