• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[儿童新型抗结核短期化学预防方案的依从性和耐受性——一项试点项目]

[Compliance and tolerance of new antitubercular short-term chemopreventive regimens in childhood--a pilot project].

作者信息

Magdorf K, Arizzi-Rusche A F, Geiter L J, O'Brien R J, Wahn U

机构信息

Abt. f. pädiatrische Pneumologie und Immunologie, Universitätskinderklinik, UKRV, Berlin.

出版信息

Pneumologie. 1994 Oct;48(10):761-4.

PMID:7808991
Abstract

Efficacy of preventive chemotherapy in tuberculosis-infected children depends to a great extend on medical compliance and drug tolerability. Two new short-course chemoprevention-regimes of tuberculosis--four months Rifampin (A) and two months Rifampin plus Pyrazinamide (B)--were compared with the well established regimen of six months Isoniacid (C). 150 children (mean age 3.6 years with Tb conversion) were randomly allocated to these three regimens. 13 patients were non-compliant, in terms of interview, urinary INH-test strips, urine colour and prescription frequency: 7 in group C and 3 in group A and B, respectively. Adverse effects were observed in 5 patients: 3 in group C and 1 in group A and B. 1 child (group B) developed tuberculosis two years after stopping short course chemoprevention. Good compliance (94%) as well as neglectable risks of adverse effects (2%) justify further controlled studies to evaluate the efficacy of short course chemoprevention in childhood.

摘要

预防性化疗对感染结核病儿童的疗效在很大程度上取决于医疗依从性和药物耐受性。将两种新的结核病短程化学预防方案——四个月利福平(方案A)和两个月利福平加吡嗪酰胺(方案B)——与已确立的六个月异烟肼方案(方案C)进行了比较。150名儿童(平均年龄3.6岁,结核菌素试验阳转)被随机分配到这三种方案中。根据访谈、尿中异烟肼检测试纸、尿液颜色和处方频率,有13名患者不依从:方案C组7名,方案A组和B组各3名。5名患者出现了不良反应:方案C组3名,方案A组和B组各1名。1名儿童(方案B组)在停止短程化学预防两年后患了结核病。良好的依从性(94%)以及可忽略不计的不良反应风险(2%)证明有必要进一步开展对照研究,以评估儿童短程化学预防的疗效。

相似文献

1
[Compliance and tolerance of new antitubercular short-term chemopreventive regimens in childhood--a pilot project].[儿童新型抗结核短期化学预防方案的依从性和耐受性——一项试点项目]
Pneumologie. 1994 Oct;48(10):761-4.
2
[Characteristics and treatment outcomes of INH-resistant or RFP-resistant tuberculosis].[耐异烟肼或耐利福平结核病的特征及治疗结果]
Kekkaku. 2003 Oct;78(10):611-7.
3
Treatment of lymph node tuberculosis--a randomized clinical trial of two 6-month regimens.淋巴结结核的治疗——两种6个月治疗方案的随机临床试验
Trop Med Int Health. 2005 Nov;10(11):1090-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2005.01493.x.
4
Fixed-dose combination chemotherapy (Rifater/Rifinah) for active pulmonary tuberculosis in Taiwan: a two-year follow-up.固定剂量复合化疗(卫肺宁/利福平异烟肼)用于台湾地区活动性肺结核的两年随访
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2002 Nov;6(11):1029-32.
5
The effectiveness of a 9-month regimen of isoniazid alone versus 3- and 4-month regimens of isoniazid plus rifampin for treatment of latent tuberculosis infection in children: results of an 11-year randomized study.9个月异烟肼单药治疗方案与3个月和4个月异烟肼联合利福平治疗方案对儿童潜伏性结核感染的疗效比较:一项为期11年的随机研究结果
Clin Infect Dis. 2007 Sep 15;45(6):715-22. doi: 10.1086/520983. Epub 2007 Aug 6.
6
A controlled clinical trial of oral short-course regimens in the treatment of sputum-positive pulmonary tuberculosis. Tuberculosis Research Centre.口服短程疗法治疗痰菌阳性肺结核的对照临床试验。结核病研究中心。
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 1997 Dec;1(6):509-17.
7
[Compliance, tolerance and effectiveness of a short chemoprophylaxis regimen for the treatment of tuberculosis].[短程化学预防方案治疗结核病的依从性、耐受性及有效性]
Med Clin (Barc). 1998 Oct 10;111(11):401-4.
8
Split-drug regimens for the treatment of patients with sputum smear-positive pulmonary tuberculosis--a unique approach.用于治疗痰涂片阳性肺结核患者的分药方案——一种独特的方法。
Trop Med Int Health. 2004 May;9(5):551-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2004.01229.x.
9
Assessment of a combined preparation of isoniazid, rifampicin and pyrazinamide (Rifater) in the initial phase of chemotherapy in three 6-month regimens for smear-positive pulmonary tuberculosis: a five-year follow-up report.对异烟肼、利福平与吡嗪酰胺联合制剂(卫非特)在三种6个月疗程的涂阳肺结核化疗初始阶段的评估:一项五年随访报告
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 1999 Feb;3(2):126-32.
10
[Side effects of various combinations of rifampin and isoniazid with ethambutol or streptomycin and pyrazinamide in short-term chemotherapy of newly-detected pulmonary tuberculosis].[利福平与异烟肼分别联合乙胺丁醇或链霉素及吡嗪酰胺用于新发现肺结核短期化疗的各种组合的副作用]
Pneumonol Pol. 1980 Jul;48(7):469-79.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical practice guideline for the evaluation, treatment, and follow-up of children in contact with patients with pulmonary tuberculosis in Colombia.哥伦比亚接触肺结核患者儿童的评估、治疗及随访临床实践指南
Colomb Med (Cali). 2025 Mar 30;56(1):e6005918. doi: 10.25100/cm.v56i1.5918. eCollection 2025 Jan-Mar.
2
Efficacy and Safety of Different Drug Regimens for Tuberculosis Preventive Treatment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.不同药物方案用于结核病预防性治疗的疗效与安全性:一项系统评价和Meta分析
Cureus. 2023 Apr 26;15(4):e38182. doi: 10.7759/cureus.38182. eCollection 2023 Apr.
3
Guidelines for the Treatment of Latent Tuberculosis Infection: Recommendations from the National Tuberculosis Controllers Association and CDC, 2020.
潜伏结核感染治疗指南:美国国家结核病控制协会和美国疾病预防控制中心 2020 年推荐意见。
MMWR Recomm Rep. 2020 Feb 14;69(1):1-11. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.rr6901a1.
4
Efficacy and completion rates of rifapentine and isoniazid (3HP) compared to other treatment regimens for latent tuberculosis infection: a systematic review with network meta-analyses.利福喷汀和异烟肼(3HP)与其他潜伏性结核感染治疗方案相比的疗效和完成率:一项网络荟萃分析的系统评价
BMC Infect Dis. 2017 Apr 11;17(1):265. doi: 10.1186/s12879-017-2377-x.
5
Rifamycins (rifampicin, rifabutin and rifapentine) compared to isoniazid for preventing tuberculosis in HIV-negative people at risk of active TB.在有活动性结核病风险的HIV阴性人群中,利福霉素(利福平、利福布汀和利福喷汀)与异烟肼用于预防结核病的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jul 5;2013(7):CD007545. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007545.pub2.
6
Antituberculosis drug-induced hepatotoxicity in children.儿童抗结核药物性肝毒性
Pediatr Rep. 2011 Jun 16;3(2):e16. doi: 10.4081/pr.2011.e16.
7
Latent tuberculosis in children: diagnosis and management.儿童潜伏性结核:诊断与管理。
Indian J Pediatr. 2011 Apr;78(4):464-8. doi: 10.1007/s12098-010-0295-7. Epub 2010 Dec 3.