• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

恒河猴(猕猴)对人工多态类别的辨别

Discrimination of artificial polymorphous categories by rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta).

作者信息

Jitsumori M

机构信息

Department of Cognition and Information Sciences, Faculty of Letters, Chiba University, Japan.

出版信息

Q J Exp Psychol B. 1994 Nov;47(4):371-86.

PMID:7809403
Abstract

Monkeys (Macaca mulatta) were trained to discriminate between sets of artificial stimuli such as those used by Jitsumori (1993) for pigeons and humans. The stimuli were arrays of symbols differing along three two-valued (positive or negative) dimensions. The discrimination required was between polymorphous categories in which a positive stimulus was defined by possession of any 2 out of 3 positive features. Of the 5 monkeys, 3 learned the discrimination much faster than did pigeons, but transfer to novel stimuli was less impressive than had been shown in pigeons. The 3 monkeys showed high levels of transfer to the stimuli that contained either all 3 positive or all 3 negative features, but 2 of the 3 monkeys failed to show transfer to stimuli that had 1 of the 3 features replaced with a novel one. Analysis of the monkeys' performance raised doubts on the additive integration of features but supported learning of feature combinations as a basis for the discrimination of polymorphous categories by this species.

摘要

猴子(恒河猴)经过训练,以区分人工刺激集,比如Jitsumori(1993年)用于鸽子和人类的那些刺激。刺激是沿三个二值(正或负)维度不同的符号阵列。所需的辨别是在多态类别之间,其中正刺激由拥有3个正特征中的任意2个来定义。在5只猴子中,3只学习辨别比鸽子快得多,但向新刺激的迁移不如在鸽子中表现得那么显著。这3只猴子对包含所有3个正特征或所有3个负特征的刺激表现出高水平的迁移,但3只猴子中有2只未能向3个特征中有1个被新特征取代的刺激表现出迁移。对猴子表现的分析对特征的加法整合提出了疑问,但支持将特征组合的学习作为该物种辨别多态类别的基础。

相似文献

1
Discrimination of artificial polymorphous categories by rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta).恒河猴(猕猴)对人工多态类别的辨别
Q J Exp Psychol B. 1994 Nov;47(4):371-86.
2
Discrimination of artificial categories structured by family resemblances: a comparative study in people (Homo sapiens) and pigeons (Columba livia).基于家族相似性构建的人工类别的辨别:人类(智人)与鸽子(家鸽)的比较研究
J Comp Psychol. 2007 Feb;121(1):22-33. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.121.1.22.
3
Mechanisms of same/different abstract-concept learning by rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta).恒河猴(猕猴)对相同/不同抽象概念的学习机制
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2002 Oct;28(4):358-68.
4
Feature-positive and feature-negative learning in the rhesus monkey and pigeon.恒河猴和鸽子的特征阳性与特征阴性学习
Am J Psychol. 1980 Sep;93(3):409-27.
5
Discrimination strategies of humans and rhesus monkeys for complex visual displays.人类和恒河猴对复杂视觉显示的辨别策略。
Curr Biol. 2006 Apr 18;16(8):814-20. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2006.03.027.
6
Categorization of natural stimuli by monkeys (Macaca mulatta): effects of stimulus set size and modification of exemplars.猕猴(恒河猴)对自然刺激的分类:刺激集大小和范例修改的影响。
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1987 Apr;13(2):136-43.
7
Disconnect in concept learning by rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta): judgment of relations and relations-between-relations.恒河猴(猕猴)在概念学习中的脱节:关系判断与关系间关系的判断
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2007 Jan;33(1):55-63. doi: 10.1037/0097-7403.33.1.55.
8
Categorization of biologically significant objects, food and gender, in rhesus monkeys. I. Behavioral study.恒河猴对具有生物学意义的物体、食物和性别的分类。I. 行为学研究
Neurosci Res. 2008 May;61(1):70-8. doi: 10.1016/j.neures.2008.01.013. Epub 2008 Feb 6.
9
Labeling and family resemblance in the discrimination of polymorphous categories by pigeons.鸽子对多态范畴的辨别中的标记和家族相似性。
Anim Cogn. 2011 Jan;14(1):21-34. doi: 10.1007/s10071-010-0339-4. Epub 2010 Jul 23.
10
Change detection by rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) and pigeons (Columba livia).恒河猴(猕猴)和鸽子(家鸽)的变化检测
J Comp Psychol. 2012 Aug;126(3):203-12. doi: 10.1037/a0026356. Epub 2012 Mar 19.

引用本文的文献

1
The transfer of category knowledge by macaques (Macaca mulatta) and humans (Homo sapiens).猕猴(恒河猴)和人类(智人)对类别知识的迁移。
J Comp Psychol. 2018 Feb;132(1):58-74. doi: 10.1037/com0000095. Epub 2017 Dec 14.
2
Cross-modal information integration in category learning.类别学习中的跨模态信息整合
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2014 Jul;76(5):1473-84. doi: 10.3758/s13414-014-0659-6.
3
The learning of basic-level categories by pigeons: the prototype effect, attention, and effects of categorization.鸽子对基本层次类别的学习:原型效应、注意力及分类效应
Learn Behav. 2011 Sep;39(3):271-87. doi: 10.3758/s13420-011-0028-4.
4
Contrasting the edge- and surface-based theories of object recognition: behavioral evidence from macaques (Macaca mulatta).对比基于边缘和基于表面的物体识别理论:来自猕猴(恒河猴)的行为证据。
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2010 Jan;36(1):148-57. doi: 10.1037/a0015629.