Contreras P, Zura M L, Aguirre C, Sepúlveda A, Depix M, Mella I
Departamento de Medicina, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Chile Hospital José Joaquín Aguirre, Santiago de Chile.
Rev Med Chil. 1994 Mar;122(3):241-7.
Fifteen male volunteers, aged 30 to 40 years old, were classified according to body mass index (BMI) as lean (n = 5, BMI less than 20 kg/m2), normal (n = 5, BMI 20-25) or obese (n = 5, BMI over 30). Glucose intolerance was ruled out by a normal oral glucose tolerance test and insulin sensitivity (SI) and glucose effectiveness (SG) were estimated by a minimal model analysis of a frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test modified by an intravenous insulin injection at minute 20. The MINMOD program was fed with 29 or 12 values (reduced sampling schedule). Despite a significant inverse correlation between BMI and SI (r = -0.533 p < 0.05), the latter parameter overlapped among groups and the correlation was lost when obese individuals were not considered. Waist/hip ratio correlated modestly with SI (r = -0.52 p < 0.05). SG did not correlate with BMI. Using the reduced sampling schedule. SI values had a correlation coefficient of 0.78 with those calculated using the usual sampling schedule, although they were 82% lower. We conclude that only a BMI of over 30 accurately predicts a low SI, and that waist/hip ratio does not have a better predictive power.
15名年龄在30至40岁之间的男性志愿者,根据体重指数(BMI)分为消瘦组(n = 5,BMI小于20kg/m²)、正常组(n = 5,BMI 20 - 25)或肥胖组(n = 5,BMI超过30)。通过正常的口服葡萄糖耐量试验排除葡萄糖不耐受,并通过对在第20分钟静脉注射胰岛素进行改良的频繁采样静脉葡萄糖耐量试验的最小模型分析来估计胰岛素敏感性(SI)和葡萄糖效能(SG)。MINMOD程序采用29个或12个值(简化采样方案)。尽管BMI与SI之间存在显著的负相关(r = -0.533,p < 0.05),但后一参数在各组之间有重叠,且不考虑肥胖个体时相关性消失。腰臀比与SI有适度的相关性(r = -0.52,p < 0.05)。SG与BMI无相关性。采用简化采样方案时,SI值与使用常规采样方案计算的值的相关系数为0.78,尽管其值低82%。我们得出结论,只有BMI超过30才能准确预测低SI,且腰臀比没有更好的预测能力。