Agbaje Olorunsola F, Luzio Stephen D, Albarrak Ahmed I S, Lunn David J, Owens David R, Hovorka Roman
Metabolic Modelling Group, Centre for Measurement and Information in Medicine, City University, Northampton Square, London EC1V OHB, UK.
Clin Sci (Lond). 2003 Nov;105(5):551-60. doi: 10.1042/CS20030117.
We adopted Bayesian analysis in combination with hierarchical (population) modelling to estimate simultaneously population and individual insulin sensitivity (SI) and glucose effectiveness (SG) with the minimal model of glucose kinetics using data collected during insulin-modified intravenous glucose tolerance test (IVGTT) and made comparison with the standard non-linear regression analysis. After fasting overnight, subjects with newly presenting Type II diabetes according to World Health Organization criteria (n =65; 53 males, 12 females; age, 54 +/- 9 years; body mass index, 30.4 +/- 5.2 kg/m2; means+/-S.D.) underwent IVGTT consisting of a 0.3 g of glucose bolus/kg of body weight given at time zero for 2 min, followed by 0.05 unit of insulin/kg of body weight at 20 min. Bayesian inference was carried out using vague prior distributions and log-normal distributions to guarantee non-negativity and, thus, physiological plausibility of model parameters and associated credible intervals. Bayesian analysis gave estimates of SI in all subjects. Non-linear regression analysis failed in four cases, where Bayesian analysis-derived SI was located in the lower quartile and was estimated with lower precision. The population means of SI and SG provided by Bayesian analysis and non-linear regression were identical, but the interquartile range given by Bayesian analysis was tighter by approx. 20% for SI and by approx. 15% for SG. Individual insulin sensitivities estimated by the two methods were highly correlated ( rS=0.98; P <0.001). However, the correlation in the lower 20% centile of the insulin-sensitivity range was significantly lower than the correlation in the upper 80% centile ( rS=0.71 compared with rS=0.99; P <0.001). We conclude that the Bayesian hierarchical analysis is an appealing method to estimate SI and SG, as it avoids parameter estimation failures, and should be considered when investigating insulin-resistant subjects.
我们采用贝叶斯分析结合分层(总体)建模,利用胰岛素改良静脉葡萄糖耐量试验(IVGTT)期间收集的数据,通过葡萄糖动力学最小模型同时估计总体和个体的胰岛素敏感性(SI)及葡萄糖效能(SG),并与标准非线性回归分析进行比较。过夜禁食后,根据世界卫生组织标准新诊断为II型糖尿病的受试者(n = 65;53名男性,12名女性;年龄54±9岁;体重指数30.4±5.2 kg/m2;均值±标准差)接受IVGTT,试验包括在0分钟时给予0.3 g葡萄糖推注/千克体重,持续2分钟,随后在20分钟时给予0.05单位胰岛素/千克体重。使用模糊先验分布和对数正态分布进行贝叶斯推断,以确保模型参数及相关可信区间的非负性,从而保证其生理合理性。贝叶斯分析给出了所有受试者的SI估计值。非线性回归分析在4例中失败,而贝叶斯分析得出的SI位于下四分位数,且估计精度较低。贝叶斯分析和非线性回归提供的SI和SG总体均值相同,但贝叶斯分析给出的四分位间距对于SI约窄20%,对于SG约窄15%。两种方法估计的个体胰岛素敏感性高度相关(rS = 0.98;P < 0.001)。然而,胰岛素敏感性范围下20%百分位数的相关性显著低于上80%百分位数的相关性(rS = 0.71与rS = 0.99相比;P < 0.001)。我们得出结论,贝叶斯分层分析是估计SI和SG的一种有吸引力的方法,因为它避免了参数估计失败,在研究胰岛素抵抗受试者时应予以考虑。