Suppr超能文献

非呼吸暂停性打鼾患者使用鼻持续气道正压通气治疗?

Nasal continuous positive airway pressure for nonapneic snoring?

作者信息

Rauscher H, Formanek D, Zwick H

机构信息

Pulmonary Department, Krankenhaus Lainz, Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

Chest. 1995 Jan;107(1):58-61. doi: 10.1378/chest.107.1.58.

Abstract

The feasibility of nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) for heavy snoring associated with daytime sleepiness was studied in 118 consecutive patients with an apnea hypopnea index below 5. Fifty-nine of them reported daytime sleepiness in a questionnaire and were offered treatment with nasal CPAP. Whereas 48 patients refused it, the remaining 11 (19%) accepted nasal CPAP for home therapy. Acceptors and refusers did not differ in sleep structure, but acceptors had slightly more sleep-disordered breathing events per hour of sleep than refusers. The pressure needed to abolish snoring in these 11 patients was 7.3 +/- 1.6 cm H2O. Six months after prescription, the built-in time counters of the patients' devices were read. By dividing the hours of operation by the days since initiation of treatment, we found a mean daily use time of only 2.8 +/- 1.5 h. Nevertheless, eight patients (73%) reported that their sleepiness had improved with therapy. We conclude that only a minority of nonapneic snorers accept treatment with nasal CPAP on a long-term basis and that this subgroup is not predictable from polysomnography.

摘要

对118例呼吸暂停低通气指数低于5的连续性鼾症且伴有日间嗜睡的患者,研究了鼻持续气道正压通气(CPAP)的可行性。其中59例患者在问卷调查中报告有日间嗜睡,并接受了鼻CPAP治疗。48例患者拒绝治疗,其余11例(19%)接受了鼻CPAP家庭治疗。接受治疗者和拒绝治疗者在睡眠结构上无差异,但接受治疗者每小时睡眠中睡眠呼吸紊乱事件略多于拒绝治疗者。这11例患者消除打鼾所需的压力为7.3±1.6 cm H2O。处方6个月后,读取患者设备的内置时间计数器。通过将运行小时数除以治疗开始后的天数,我们发现平均每日使用时间仅为2.8±1.5小时。然而,8例患者(73%)报告其嗜睡症状经治疗后有所改善。我们得出结论,只有少数非呼吸暂停性打鼾者长期接受鼻CPAP治疗,且该亚组无法通过多导睡眠图预测。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验