Hung T P, Chen S T
Department of Neurology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei.
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1995 Jan;58(1):75-80. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.58.1.75.
Although the concept of brain death has been widely accepted, the criteria required for making the diagnosis remain controversial. This prospective study was undertaken to examine the reliability of a set of clinical criteria adopted in Taiwan. One hundred and forty deeply comatose patients (101 men, 39 women; mean age 49.5 (SD 17.6) years) requiring ventilation were studied. Seventy three patients met the clinical criteria for brainstem death; all developed cardiac asystole (97% within seven days) despite continued full cardiorespiratory support. Brainstem death was diagnosed in only two of the 21 patients with hypoxic or ischaemic insults. This stresses the rarity of hypoxic or ischaemic encephalopathy as a cause of brainstem death. The results show that if strict attention is paid to preconditions and exclusions, brainstem death can be reliably diagnosed on clinical grounds alone.
尽管脑死亡的概念已被广泛接受,但做出诊断所需的标准仍存在争议。本前瞻性研究旨在检验台湾采用的一套临床标准的可靠性。研究对象为140例需要机械通气的深度昏迷患者(男性101例,女性39例;平均年龄49.5(标准差17.6)岁)。73例患者符合脑干死亡的临床标准;尽管持续给予充分的心肺支持,但所有患者均发生心搏停止(97%在7天内)。21例缺氧或缺血性损伤患者中仅有2例被诊断为脑干死亡。这突出了缺氧或缺血性脑病作为脑干死亡原因的罕见性。结果表明,如果严格注意前提条件和排除标准,仅根据临床依据就能可靠地诊断脑干死亡。