Lancet. 1995 Jan 28;345(8944):209-12.
Screening and carotid endarterectomy have been advocated for asymptomatic carotid stenosis. However, the risk of stroke without treatment has not been adequately defined. We investigated the risk of stroke in the distribution of the asymptomatic carotid artery in 2295 patients randomised in the European Carotid Surgery Trial. During a mean follow-up of 4.5 years, there were 69 carotid territory strokes, nine of which were fatal, giving three year Kaplan-Meier risks of stroke and fatal stroke of 2.1% (95% Cl, 1.5-2.8) and 0.3% (95% Cl, 0.06-0.56) respectively. The stroke risk in the 127 patients with severe (70-99%) carotid stenosis was 5.7% (95% Cl, 1.5-9.8). Given these low stroke risks, the potential benefit of endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid stenosis is small. Population screening is not justified and endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid stenosis should only be performed in the context of well organised randomised controlled trials.
对于无症状性颈动脉狭窄,已提倡进行筛查和颈动脉内膜切除术。然而,未经治疗时的中风风险尚未得到充分界定。我们在欧洲颈动脉外科试验中对2295例随机分组的患者,调查了无症状颈动脉分布区域的中风风险。在平均4.5年的随访期间,有69例发生颈动脉供血区域中风,其中9例死亡,3年的卡普兰-迈耶中风风险和致命性中风风险分别为2.1%(95%可信区间,1.5 - 2.8)和0.3%(95%可信区间,0.06 - 0.56)。127例严重(70 - 99%)颈动脉狭窄患者的中风风险为5.7%(95%可信区间,1.5 - 9.8)。鉴于这些较低的中风风险,内膜切除术对无症状性颈动脉狭窄的潜在益处很小。人群筛查不合理,无症状性颈动脉狭窄的内膜切除术仅应在精心组织的随机对照试验背景下进行。