Qin X Q, Livingston D M, Ewen M, Sellers W R, Arany Z, Kaelin W G
Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts 02115.
Mol Cell Biol. 1995 Feb;15(2):742-55. doi: 10.1128/MCB.15.2.742.
Reintroduction of RB into SAOS2 (RB-/-) cells causes a G1 arrest and characteristic cellular swelling. Coexpression of the cellular transcription factor E2F-1 could overcome these effects. The ability of E2F-1 to bind to RB was neither necessary nor sufficient for this effect, and S-phase entry was not accompanied by RB hyperphosphorylation under these conditions. Furthermore, E2F-1 could overcome the actions of a nonphosphorylatable but otherwise intact RB mutant. These data, together with the fact that RB binds to E2F-1 in vivo, suggest that E2F-1 is a downstream target of RB action. Mutational analysis showed that the ability of E2F-1 to bind to DNA was necessary and sufficient to block the formation of large cells by RB, whereas the ability to induce S-phase entry required a functional transactivation domain as well. Thus, the induction of a G1 arrest and the formation of large cells by RB in these cells can be genetically dissociated. Furthermore, the ability of the E2F-1 DNA-binding domain alone to block one manifestation of RB action is consistent with the notion that RB-E2F complexes actively repress transcription upon binding to certain E2F-responsive promoters. In keeping with this view, we show here that coproduction of an E2F1 mutant capable of binding to DNA, yet unable to transactivate, is sufficient to block RB-mediated transcriptional repression.
将RB重新导入SAOS2(RB基因敲除)细胞会导致G1期阻滞和典型的细胞肿胀。细胞转录因子E2F-1的共表达可克服这些效应。E2F-1与RB结合的能力对于这种效应既非必要条件也非充分条件,并且在这些条件下进入S期并不伴随着RB的过度磷酸化。此外,E2F-1可以克服一种不可磷酸化但其他方面完整的RB突变体的作用。这些数据,连同RB在体内与E2F-1结合的事实,表明E2F-1是RB作用的下游靶点。突变分析表明,E2F-1与DNA结合的能力对于阻止RB形成大细胞是必要且充分的,而诱导进入S期的能力还需要一个功能性的反式激活结构域。因此,在这些细胞中RB诱导的G1期阻滞和大细胞形成在遗传上是可以分离的。此外,单独的E2F-1 DNA结合结构域阻止RB作用的一种表现的能力与RB-E2F复合物在结合某些E2F反应性启动子时积极抑制转录的观点一致。与此观点一致,我们在此表明,共产生一种能够结合DNA但不能反式激活的E2F1突变体足以阻止RB介导 的转录抑制。